Jimmer
Contributor
I really dont understand this fascination with Apeks. I bought some Oceanic Delta IV's about 6 months ago and all my colleagues and fellow divers went on at me saying i should have bought Apeks or Aqualungs. I thought fine, but I liked my Oceanics, I like the swivel, I like look and above all they breath great.
About a month ago I got a chance to use a set of Apeks XTX50 for a week and, I honestly found them worse than the Oceanics, perhaps they needed servicing too (I doubt it), the breath wasnt as smooth and I found the second stage a lot more uncomfortable due to the lack of swivel.
I guess the other argument for XTX50s is ruggedness. They do feel very strong, they certainly feel more rugged than my Oceanics. That said, ive done well over 200 dives with my Oceanics in 6 months and the only thing that has deteriorated is the mouthpiece.
I think that favour towards Apeks has been born out of tech diving and reliability over the years, but this doesnt mean that newer brands arent up to the task. In my opinion the FDX10 Delta IV is a fantastic regulator that breaths brilliantly, is comfortable and is rugged enough to survive the demands of working with a PADI instructor everyday.
However the only drawback is when it comes to tech, im no tech diver (yet) so im not sure but looking at the swivel, I can imagine that fitting a longer hose could be problematic and the Apeks looked a lot more versatile, ive not really looked into it though so i dont know.
The swivel is a pretty easy work around with the Delta 4. You just need one part from the GT3 second stage, and then you can use a standard hose.
I honestly don't understand the way people seem to run away from Oceanic. They have a good history making regs, produce some very high performance regs. Maybe they just haven't been pushing hard enough into the tech world so far. I think with time, and the addition of Hollis, Oceanic will start to show up more and more on tech diver's rigs.