Originally posted by Ladydiver
2) whoever it was that supplied an untrained, uncertified diver with equipment and air.
I think this goes deeper than most people think.
Who read their Latest UJ?
In the DM and assisting section, there was the accident Senario. Briefly, a newly qualified diver went into shop asked about dives, saying she was a beginner, and was booked on a boat. When she get there found it was a 26m dive. In water at depth had problem. and with buddy ended dive via a AAS ascent.
The official PADI analysis of accident was that she was doing a dive beyond her capability and had overbreated her reg. Both her and buddy had done correct thing and aborted with suitable ascent.
No where did they realise that the fault lay with the dive shop. Having said she was a beginner, why was she booked on a dive to 26m? Had the DM on the boat checked peoples qualifications? logbooks?
If the PADI analysis of such a mistake is so obviously wrong, how can we expect dive centres to behave professionally, and not let people do dives they are not qualified to do.
The case mentioned by ladydiver would have been prevented at two different points if people had just been consciencious.
I've had similar experiences when less qualified friends have booked trips and found the dive unsuitable having expresseley asked for OW suitable dives.
Jon T