Another bad year for the Gulf of Mexico?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

cdiver2

Contributor
Messages
3,783
Reaction score
8
Location
Safety Harbor (West central) GB xpat
# of dives
500 - 999
From the BBC 7-18-07

Gulf dead zone to be biggest ever

Dead fish washed up from a hypoxic zone near the German coast
This year could see the biggest "dead zone" since records began form in the waters of the Gulf of Mexico.

Scientists say conditions are right for the zone to exceed last summer's 6,662 sq miles (17,255 sq km).

The dead zone is an area of water virtually devoid of oxygen which cannot support marine life.

It is caused by nutrients such as fertilisers flowing into the Gulf, stimulating the growth of algae which absorbs the available oxygen.

The volume of nutrients flowing down rivers such as the Mississippi into the Gulf has tripled over the last 50 years.

The annual event has been blamed for shark attacks along the Gulf coast, as sharks, along with other highly mobile species, flee the inhospitable waters.

Animals which cannot move simply die.

Nutrient load

The relatively high nitrate loading may be due to more intensive farming of more land, including crops used for biofuels

Eugene Turner
"I am anticipating a historically large hypoxic (oxygen-deficient) zone this summer, because the nitrate loading this May, a critical month influencing the size of the area, was very high," said Eugene Turner from Louisiana State University.

"The relatively high nitrate loading may be due to more intensive farming of more land, including crops used for biofuels, unique weather patterns, or changing farming practices."

The nitrate load is so high that the dead zone may attain a size of 8,500 sq miles (22,015 sq km), almost double the average since 1990.

However, an active storm season could change that forecast, as storms mix the seas, dispersing nutrients and algae and bringing in oxygenated water.


Algae also cause severe pollution in lakes such as Dianchi in China
Professor Turner is one of the scientists involved in modelling the dead zone, supported by the US National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa).

The United Nations warns that dead zones are becoming more common globally as intensive agriculture spreads.

Its 2003 Global Environment Outlook said that the number of seasonal hypoxic areas has doubled each decade since the 1960s.

The UN believes the algal blooms are having a significant impact on commercially valuable fish stocks.
 
I find it terribly ironic that the current U.S. fad for "green biofuels" will be directly responsible for choking the northern Gulf of Mexico with fertilizer runoff.

Grow more corn. Yeah, that was thought through...:D
 
On the upside, a new study has come out that says farms can be just as productive using non-synthesized fertilizers. Using these organic fertilizers will dramatically decrease the amount of nutrients that are carried by our river systems into the Gulf of Mexico.
 
How does *organic* fertilizer work better from a nutrient runoff perspective than *synthetic* fertilizer? Is less of the organic stuff needed to do the same job?
 
Several organic fertilizers are soil additives that brake down over time to provide nutients to crops. It would seem logical that these would produce less runoff than synthetic fertilizers sprayed onto the surface. I don't have any evidence to support this. Can anyone either back me up or contradict me.
 
# Organic farming reduced local and regional groundwater pollution by not applying agricultural chemicals.

Article on organic farming
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/07/050714004407.htm

From a different article
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070711134523.htm

Organic farming is important because conventional agriculture—which involves high-yielding plants, mechanized tillage, synthetic fertilizers and biocides—is so detrimental to the environment, Perfecto said. For instance, fertilizer runoff from conventional agriculture is the chief culprit in creating dead zones—low oxygen areas where marine life cannot survive. Proponents of organic farming argue that conventional farming also causes soil erosion, greenhouse gas emission, increased pest resistance and loss of biodiversity.

How organic farms would apply nitrogen

Green manures are cover crops which are plowed into the soil to provide natural soil amendments instead of synthetic fertilizers. They found that planting green manures between growing seasons provided enough nitrogen to farm organically without synthetic fertilizers.
 
David,
The article you provided would actually suggest that organic farming would have no affect on the hypoxic zone in the gulf of mexico, because it states that nitrate leaching was about the same in organic crops as in traditional crops. Nitrate runoff is the issue causing the hypoxic zones. I'm not sure if this is what you were trying to say or not. It does contradict what I thought w/o any evidence.
 
The second article doesn't really say that there is any evidence that there is less fertilizer runoff from organic farming. Don't take this the wrong way. I am a proponent of organic farming. I pay a large premium to buy organic products when I grocery shop. I'd like to see evidence that there is indeed less runoff, because, as I stated in my first post, it seems intuitive that there would be, but the first article you posted directly contradicts this and the second one doesn't really address it.
 
The article didn't go into detail, but if nitrate-leaching is the problem, and if organic farms cause just as much of it as regular farms, then we should get used to the Gulf of Mexico turning anoxic for half the year.

I did find this interesting article while searching for leaching info:

If nitrogen is the substance that's killing the gulf, artificial drainage is the hypodermic syringe mainlining it into the nation's aquatic arteries. Natural drainage systems, such as prairie potholes and wetlands, can hold 40 to 90 percent of the nitrogen that runs off a field, according to the Bill Mitsch, wetland ecologist at Ohio State University. Artificial drainage sends water directly into rivers, eliminating opportunities for nutrients to be captured by vegetation and soil. University of Minnesota soil scientist David Mulla says, "Tile drainage is one of the most important mechanisms for transfer of nitrate-nitrogen to the Mississippi basin."

http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/volunteer/julaug01/hypoxia.html
 

Back
Top Bottom