Advice On Building A Set Of Doubles

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

I am kind of old school in that I don't mind a horseshoe wing. If you are in an assymetric configuration, with perhaps a stage bottle or deco bottles on one side, the horse shoe design makes it slightly easier to carry slightly more gas in one side of the wing than the other to maintain trim around the longitudinal axis.

On the other hand, despite all the hype about perfect trim and streamlining and all the effort by technical divers to be perfectly horizontal (especially in front of a camera), most technical divers do not trim with a zero angle most of the time, but rather closer to 5 or 10 degrees head up from perfectly horizontal given the realities of having to look forward on necks that were made for bipeds. So the horse shoe wing still effectively transfers gas back and forth from side to side in all but a marked head down trim position.

More importantly, a wing with just a wee bit of taco effect, horse shoe or donut, is not an entirely bad thing. If the wing is completely under the tanks and is in effect "flat" with zero air trapping, it can be hard to maintain a bit more gas in one side or the other, while just a small amount of taco will allow enough of a bubble to compensate for assymetric loads without creating objectionable "air trapping" issues.

Generally speaking, if I can roll 360 degrees in either direction and do not have trim issues after completing the roll while maintaining a near zero trim angle, the wing (and any taco effect) is not overly large.
 
try the oms 40lb wing
 
I am kind of old school in that I don't mind a horseshoe wing. If you are in an assymetric configuration, with perhaps a stage bottle or deco bottles on one side, the horse shoe design makes it slightly easier to carry slightly more gas in one side of the wing than the other to maintain trim around the longitudinal axis.


The lower arc of a donut wing is under the bottom of the cylinders, between the tanks and the diver's rear end. To shift gas from one side to the other through the lower arc of a donut wing requires effort and a specific set of motions, butt up, and roll. This is **very** unlikely to happen inadvertently.

Carrying more gas in one side of a horseshoe or donut is easy accomplished.

On the other hand, despite all the hype about perfect trim and streamlining and all the effort by technical divers to be perfectly horizontal (especially in front of a camera), most technical divers do not trim with a zero angle most of the time, but rather closer to 5 or 10 degrees head up from perfectly horizontal given the realities of having to look forward on necks that were made for bipeds. So the horse shoe wing still effectively transfers gas back and forth from side to side in all but a marked head down trim position.

True

More importantly, a wing with just a wee bit of taco effect, horse shoe or donut, is not an entirely bad thing. If the wing is completely under the tanks and is in effect "flat" with zero air trapping, it can be hard to maintain a bit more gas in one side or the other, while just a small amount of taco will allow enough of a bubble to compensate for assymetric loads without creating objectionable "air trapping" issues.


All doubles wings "wrap" Doubles wing can only inflate "outboard" of where the tanks contact the backplate, and this is essentially down the edges of the plate. Unlike singles wings where the designer can reduce the amount of "Taco" and over all wing width by using a narrow center panel, doubles wings have to inflate "beyond" the plate.

Tobin
 

Back
Top Bottom