i have no issues with someone lasting 79 minutes on a dive
unfortunately it doesn't seem that it is what happened here.
On the contrary, it seems that you do have a problem with it. see below......
fair enough you can't keep eye contact with your students at all times but...how do you justify the fact that she has been down there for 1 hour and 19 minutes?
And my more than adequate reply.
1:19 would have been the time from going under the water, to Dalelynn bringing her to the surface......nobody has said exactly how long was spent searching for her, and a 1 hour dive is not unheard of.
and your response
quite irrelevant from when you count the time
i'm sure 1 hour dives are not unheard of, but allow me to doubt that a brand new diver will last that long on one tank of air
ok, all good...but, at the checkout dives, at least based on the agency that we took our training with, there are depth parameters set for each of the 4 dives, and as opposed to what normal practice is to do deepest dive first, for the purpose of training the checkout dives are done backwards, shallow dive first and subsequent ones deeper
my understanding from reading the rest of the thread is that when the accident occurred they were on the second day, third dive so they should have been deeper than 20-30 ft, again this is based on the standards of my agency, i don't know what PADI's are
regardless of all this, the fact remains that whomever was in charge lost sight of the student for way too long
Nobody denies that the student was lost from the group during training.
You seem to be confusing the maximum allowed depth on a dive with a required depth on a dive. With PADI, the deepest the students can go on dives 1 and 2 is 40 feet, and the deepest they can go on dives 3 and 4 is 60 feet. That does not mean they must go to those depths on those dives. They can all be done at 20 feet.
see above concerning depths on training dives.
maybe this woud make it more clear where my question is aiming....so the instructor takes 4 divers out for their checkout dives
while they can't keep their eyes on them 100% of the time one would think that once in a while they make sure that the whole group is following
at some point one of the divers gets separated and its not noticed by anyone for an extended period of time, how does that happen?
It shouldnt, and in fact...that scenario didnt happen here either.....there were more than 4 students.
so in light of the above from Standards and Procedures , how does one end up with a missing diver during training?
those are the S&P's for ACUC. while you are pulling info from those S&P's try finding the definition of Direct Supervision in the same manual. I can tell you that NAUI will allow me to use a DM as a guide/direct supervision on training dives........in fact allow me to pull them from ACUC for you.
2.18 Supervision:
The act of supervise oroversee. There are several levels of supervision.These are:
·
Direct Supervision: to be physicallypresent and within an immediatedistance of the people or activitiesbeing supervised. If the supervisiontakes place underwater, to be inthe water and within an immediatedistance of the people or activitiesto be supervised
·
Indirect Supervision: to be physicallypresent. If the supervisiontakes place underwater, to be inthe water
·
General Supervision: The personsupervising oversees the overallactivities, but not necessarily eachparticipant specifically and if theactivity takes place underwater, thegeneral supervisor does not have
to be in the water
It is possible for ANY instructor to lose track of a diver in the water........it could be as simple as a stuck inflator during a touring dive. If you arent 1 foot from said diver, you will not be able to intervene. being 1 foot from students is not the intention of "DIrect supervision" in any agencies standards.......if it were the intention, then the student/instructor ratios would be drastically differant.
save face, for what? but please enlighten me where is my ignorance?
Save face because you are applying your personal opinion(uneducated as it may be) and trying to draw conclusions about the Standards of another agency......not to mention the fact that you dont fully understand the standards of whichever agency you were trained through.