A sad out come ....

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Natasha

Contributor
Messages
11,609
Reaction score
22
Location
Chicagoan living in Texas
# of dives
I'm a Fish!
Published Friday, November 2, 2001


Shark feeding on dives banned
BY SUSAN COCKING
scocking@herald.com

Insisting its decision has nothing to do with the spate of summer shark attacks in Florida, the Bahamas and elsewhere, the state Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission on Thursday passed a rule prohibiting feeding underwater marine life by divers.
OPPONENT: Joel Biddle of Reef Relief shars her view at the hearing. The ban will take effect Jan. 1 if it survives administrative and court challenges.
The rule also prohibits dive operators from escorting customers to sites where fish-feeding takes place. It does not apply to anglers chumming from boats.

If the rule survives administrative and circuit court challenges by the dive industry, it will take effect Jan. 1.
The ban, passed unanimously at a packed meeting in Key Largo, has been the subject of debate for two years.

``This is not about whether feeding marine life creates human health and safety issues,'' commissioner Julie Morris said. ``Feeding marine life alters marine-life behavior, and I believe that's damaging to Florida's marine wildlife.''

Four dive operators -- located in the Keys, and Broward and Palm Beach counties -- conduct shark- and fish-feeding dives for their customers.
Jeff Torode, who operates South Florida Diving Headquarters in Pompano Beach and said his operation has a clean safety record. He said feeding dives are educational to humans without harming fish.

``[The rule] will reinforce the misguided belief that our waters are unsafe and sharks are dangerous and should be feared,'' Torode said.

Torode was backed by Pompano Beach City Commissioner Bob Shelley.

``Don't scare our tourists by suggesting there's a problem when there isn't a problem,'' Shelley told commissioners.

``We really enjoy [interactive feeding dives]. Our sharks don't bite.''

More than 40 shark attacks have been reported since the summer, two of them fatal.

Two other prominent cases involved 8-year-old Jessie Arbogast, who was attacked July 6 in the Florida Panhandle, and Krishna Thompson, a Wall Street banker who lost his leg to a shark after being attacked in the Bahamas.

State Rep. Ken Sorensen of the Keys asked the commission through his aide, Laura Todd, to postpone a decision pending scientific study on whether shark-feeding dives contribute to shark attacks.

But commissioners said they had heard enough. The state wildlife commission has held hearings and workshops on marine-life feedings since 1999. Last month, the agency offered proposed guidelines that would have allowed the practice to continue, but those were rejected by dive operators.

Tallahassee attorney Bob Harris, representing dive operators, vowed to go to circuit court in Leon County on Monday to seek an injunction blocking the rule. Harris has already filed a challenge that is scheduled to be heard by a state administrative law judge Nov. 16.

Jim Antista, general counsel for the wildlife commission, said he is confident the commission will prevail.

``We feel the commission has passed a rule that, legally, we think is very defensible,'' Antista said.

In other action Thursday, commissioners adopted a rule increasing protection of Gulf Coast snook that will take effect Jan. 1.

The bag limit was reduced from two fish to one per angler per day, and the closed season was expanded to include May.

Currently, the snook fishery is closed Dec. 15 through Jan. 31 and during June, July and August.

The new rule applies to Florida's Gulf Coast, including the Keys and Everglades National Park. Commissioners said they would review the status of east-coast snook following a stock assessment in the summer.

www.miamiherald.com
 
Here's the "logic" they're following to vote for the ban:

"Feeding reef sharks in one area causes bull sharks to attack people in a different area."

You couldn't get more flawed logic if you tried.

This is just the typical governemnt reacation of "We've got to do something!" even if it's completely and totally wrong.

Roak
 
Walter,

What about the guys who will lose revenue from not being able to do "shark dives"? Won't they be sad? Surely somebody will be sad...

Joewr...who is very glad because my granddaughter was showed she was sad when I had to go home...to paraphrase a famous actress: she likes me; she really likes me!
 
Those guys shouldn't lose revenue. They operate dive charters and take folks out for non feeding dives as well as feeding dives. They have competition in their areas who do not feed fish yet do quite well. I have dived with at least two of the operators who admit to feeding fish. There is no reason they can't compete in the market without making feeding dives. I know Jeff Torode of SFDH and use his operation often. He runs a very good operation which will continue to be competitive even after the ban is in effect. I believe Jeff is sincere in his position on feeding. I disagree with his position and he's aware of it. I don't see any reason why he would lose revenue.

WWW™
 
if he does, won't he be sad? Or maybe mad?

And, how are you? We haven't "talked" for awhile. I presume all is well down there in Henry Ford/Thomas Edison country...

Joewr...sad, mad, glad, bad, rad, dad, egad...there is a poem somewhere in there...where is the NetDoc when you need him...
 
as long as we put the ones responsible for this law in the water, and we dive to watch a handler feed them underwater.

Is this a case of protecting the innocent ? or a case of self importance by some politicos who don't understand the pyschie of the shark.......

Butch :peace:
 
I'm sad about it. The first reason is because I enjoyed going on shark feeding dives. I've been on three. Loved everyone. To be able to get "Up close and personal" with a shark is a fascinating experience. The first time, I was not the feeder, the last two times, I was.
So that said, and the fact that we are being told we can't do it here, in the U.S., just means more business for other countries. Don't we want to keep the money here, as much as possible? Believe me I sell other countries all day long. But if someone asks me for something like this and wants to stay in America, now I have to tell them it doesn't exist.
:sunny:
 
kill them when your done. Just like the other "sportsmen" do. That is still perfectly legal.


:monster:
 
to njdiver1, from another diver from NJ,
that does put it all into a very different, and very sad, and very accurate(IMO) perspective.How "civilized " we are becoming.

I have done 2 feeding dives- as an observer (Bahamas)- and while I understand the concerns, the logic of this decision escapes me.
Good thoughts, NJD,
Mike
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/perdix-ai/

Back
Top Bottom