I bought one of these PV32 lights, and it was delivered in a timely way.
But the light is really disappointing. The beam angle on the thing is about 160 degrees, so the intensity of the light is very low. Maybe the 2700 lumens are there, but they are so spread out the light is almost useless to me as a video light. I'm much better off with my two 700 lumen video lights, which I was hoping to replace. In fact, it is not as bright as my SOLA 1200 on the 300 lumen setting, which has almost as much beam angle as the PV32.
So the PV32 I received is either faulty, or is very poorly engineered, especially the optics (there is no reflector, no means to focus the light).
I suspect the problem is the engineering.
---------- Post added September 21st, 2015 at 01:55 PM ----------
More info: I purchased a tried a different battery in the PV32. It is now about twice as bright....about like my SOLA 1200 on half-power.
So, the problems are two: (1) very wide bean angle, and (2) poor battery supplied with it.
But the light is really disappointing. The beam angle on the thing is about 160 degrees, so the intensity of the light is very low. Maybe the 2700 lumens are there, but they are so spread out the light is almost useless to me as a video light. I'm much better off with my two 700 lumen video lights, which I was hoping to replace. In fact, it is not as bright as my SOLA 1200 on the 300 lumen setting, which has almost as much beam angle as the PV32.
So the PV32 I received is either faulty, or is very poorly engineered, especially the optics (there is no reflector, no means to focus the light).
I suspect the problem is the engineering.
---------- Post added September 21st, 2015 at 01:55 PM ----------
More info: I purchased a tried a different battery in the PV32. It is now about twice as bright....about like my SOLA 1200 on half-power.
So, the problems are two: (1) very wide bean angle, and (2) poor battery supplied with it.