louisianadiver
Contributor
I'd say you got "a few ok ones" Alcina. Great stuff. -Clay
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
BurBunny:All those who feel sorry for Alcina having the fish come too close (or that she was wishing she was using another lens) raise your hands...![]()
alcina:Pffft! No sympathy for me, how rude!
Another cleaning shot:
![]()
I thought you miss the 60mm cuz it is sharper than the 100mm...sorry, now I know whyalcina:? Now you've gone and confused me! I don't know what you're talking about the sharpness? Both the 100mm and 60mm are admirable in their abilities. Help a poor blonde out
I'm whining about being so close to the cleaning action (which is why I took the 100 instead of the 60 - so I wouldn't interfere and spook the cleaning action) that I couldn't get the whole fish...or even the whole fish head & at times not even the whole cleanerOf course, I could have backed away more and more and more (for some reason my port was mighty attractive today) but the golden rule is "water in front of the lens is bad - get closer!"
This shot would have been so much nicer with more fish in it instead of cut off like he is - and the 60mm would have been perfect.
More coming...
settings (ymWv) - ISO 100; f10; 1/100
alcina:caloy - I don't think the 60mm is sharper than the 100mm, sorry if I confused you or anyone!
Okie, another view of cleaning action...
![]()