"You do not have a buddy, you are a buddy."
I like that, and intend to steal it.
:cool2:
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
"You do not have a buddy, you are a buddy."
A word of caution, assuming your profile of 0-24 dives is correct: Being too quick to say the buddy system goes out the window gets pretty close to being an irresponsible diver yourself. I'd certainly opt to not dive with someone who seemed like they'd bail on me at the first sign of trouble.
My goal is to be a safe and responsible diver. I would like to dive with the same. I believe in leading by example and will seek out more experienced divers that set good examples.
Those who have to make that horrible decision have to live with it the rest of their lives. In extreme cases one fatality is better than two but it is easier said than done!
Many people complain that their buddy did not stay with them, but why did they not stay with their buddy. you do not have a buddy, you are a buddy.
What is your buddy going to do when they have a problem? if you have left them maybe drown, do you really want that on your conscience with only your good reason why you left them to defend yourself at night before bed?
I would hope that the most egregious issues can be resolved through communication during the dive planning.
@fnfalman: I understand your point...but I think the decision to wave goodbye to an insta-buddy deviating from the dive plan might not always be so clear-cut. For the sake of furthering the discussion, would your response change if you knew that your buddy did not willfully intend to descend to a depth of 150+ fsw? For example, imagine a scenario in which a diver has his/her LP inflater hose pop off of the BCD power inflater. With equipment malfunctions of this nature, I've seen newbie divers "freeze" (no kicking, no actions to rectify the situation). At that point, an attentive buddy within arm's reach would be in a position to intercede. Passive panic can certainly manifest like this. If the dive plan called for an operating depth of 100 fsw or so, it's certainly possible that narcosis played a role in the buddy going substantially deeper.One should be designated the dive leader who leads the dive. The other should follow but not blindly so. Both should be cognizance of the dive plans and each other's needs. If my buddy were to want to change the dive plan and go down to 150-ft? I'm sorry, but I am not going down there with my "buddy".
@fnfalman: I understand your point...but I think the decision to wave goodbye to an insta-buddy deviating from the dive plan might not always be so clear-cut. For the sake of furthering the discussion, would your response change if you knew that your buddy did not willfully intend to descend to a depth of 150+ fsw? For example, imagine a scenario in which a diver has his/her LP inflater hose pop off of the BCD power inflater. With equipment malfunctions of this nature, I've seen newbie divers "freeze" (no kicking, no actions to rectify the situation). At that point, an attentive buddy within arm's reach would be in a position to intercede. Passive panic can certainly manifest like this. If the dive plan called for an operating depth of 100 fsw or so, it's certainly possible that narcosis played a role in the buddy going substantially deeper.
Just something for all of us to think about...