Question Redundancies

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

If SPG's were so unreliable then tech divers doing 300 + ft dives would have sworn them off years ago, but they haven't. But if they were given a choice of using a transmitter/computer or a simple glass and brass SPG for tank pressure, my guess is that they will pick the SPG.
Hey, why don't we find out?
I have always used only spg for tech and cave dives, but that’s because I’m cheap. I would trust the shearwater transmitters as do most of my cave buddies. I wouldn’t bother with both. I have a decent idea of how much gas I have at any given time.

Isn’t this thread about a new diver, doing simple recreational OW dives? Redundancy is just not that important, as made clear by the fact that 99% of OW divers don’t bother with redundant gas monitoring and yet, somehow, they’re still alive.
 
I have always used only spg for tech and cave dives, but that’s because I’m cheap.
I've only ever used and SPG....also because I'm cheap.
I do find the idea of an air integrated computer fun, because of all the breathing rate data it could give me and that appeals to teh nerd in me...
If I ever do get one, I'm 99.9% sure that I'll back it up with an SPG too. Maybe not if I'm only doing super shallow easy dives, but otherwise....
 

Back
Top Bottom