Ops requiring AOW certs?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

When it was time for Gabe and Tina Watson to do their checkout dive on their liveaboard trip, Gabe said they didn't need to do one because he had NASDS Rescue Diver certification. The checkout dive was required by operator (Mike Ball) policy, but Gabe convinced them that he had the wherewithal to take care of his wife, a new diver. Tina died on that dive, and Gabe was absolutely incompetent in his efforts to rescue her.
Mike Ball was charged a hefty fine by the courts because they did not follow their own policy for checkout dives.

What an interesting example to use! A possible scenario had Gabe bear-hugging his new bride, possibly turning her air off until she was unconscious, and then letting her go. But with everything else that may have gone on with those two, it does demonstrate the importance of a dive op enforcing their own policies meant to be followed for the safety of all divers. But, IF Gabe did intend to murder his wife, should the owner still have been liable?


Interesting read: Death of Tina Watson - Wikipedia
 
I'm sure there is a CYA aspect to all of this, but IMHO what the ops really want is to run their business, make happy divers, and everybody come home safely (kind of all goes hand in hand in the long term). What they don't want is DRAMA at the dive site. I'm sure they would rather not have drama at all, but they would rather deal with it on land, at their shop, over the phone, via email etc. etc.. I can't really blame them.

If you're regularly going to walk in off the street and do these types of dives, get the card. If you're diving for a few days or are willing to do a little due diligence ahead of time, most of the shops I've dealt with in SFL/Keys will work with you whether it's a private guide, peruse a dive log, listen to your story (at everyone's leisure), or a reef bimble first to see if your s**t is together. If you don't like those options, keep calling around. Somebody will probably take you where you want to go. You can't swing a dead cat down there without hitting a dive op. The downside is if you're not the diver you think you are, you might get what you want. Otherwise, smooth sailing. :)
 
But, IF Gabe did intend to murder his wife, should the owner still have been liable?
That scenario was thoroughly disproven. Gabe was just incompetent. When the judge in Alabama dismissed the case without even requiring a defense, he did so based on the absurdity of the evidence against him. Most of what you read in the various stories was simply not true.
 
Interesting timing with this thread since she told me she was planning a trip somewhere in the Caribbean (she wouldn't specify where) and wanted to do some diving in the 120ft range. Whoever the dive op was, they asked for an AOW card *and* proof of dives in the last year, specifying dives below 100ft were required, before taking her money. Good thing they did, since she couldn't produce either. She was pissed, but still doesn't see the need for AOW or even a refresher.

How can she not see now? That's about as close to drawing somebody a diagram as a situation can get.

On a Rainbow Reef Dive Center boat out of Key Largo back in 2013, we were headed out to do a deep wreck morning dive. 2 Guys, young & fit looking, were on the trip. Somehow, it became known after we were out to sea that they only had OW, not AOW. The Captain offered to look at their log books, but they didn't have those. They had to sit out that dive.

How many people carry their log books on dive boats? A log book with substantial history takes time to fill out. Who wants to pack one around, much less on a boat with salt water spray, etc...?

Richard.
 
Hi @TrimixToo

Sorry, I think we were talking about two different things. I'm sure my LA County certification from 1970 and your YMCA certification from 1972 were both quite rigorous compared to today's entry level standards (see my post, #50). I was talking about activities actually executed during the certification process and you were talking about information you were exposed to in the didactic portion of the class.

We were also taught USN tables, including decompression. We did not execute planned decompression dives during certification, I doubt you did either. I no longer remember specifically all I was exposed to in the classroom, but do recall it was much broader than what we actually did. I would be extremely surprised if you dived heliox or dived to 300 feet on air during your training.

My LA County card was never challenged in the 10 years I used it. After a 17 year hiatus, I was recertified with my 12 year old son through PADI. Occasionally, just for fun, I have shown my LA County card along with my 2002 PADI nitrox card. It has not been turned down, but, I have often been asked when my last dive was and/or have supplied a short history of the LA County certification. Of course, I've always had, and generally, later shown, my more contemporary certification. LA County no longer offers basic scuba, though they do offer a tremendous advanced course. And, of course, the YMCA gave up scuba in 2008.

Very best and good diving, Craig

View attachment 413094

Oh, man, you beat me by 2 and a half years (grin)! You can't read the date on the card any more, but I was certified in September 1972. I laminated the card because it was falling apart from age. I'm jealous that yours is in great shape. The Y lost its records from the 70's to a fire some time ago, so I don't think I can even get a replacement for mine.

By today's standards, the YMCA course was, as you suggest, far more involved. I recall something like 2 nights a week with an hour in the pool and an hour in the classroom for 6-8 weeks. I wish I still had the course materials and tests, but all I have is the book.

It's certainly true that we had more classroom material than in-water exercises, in general. The OW dives and test consisted of 2 dives in shallow-ish water (perhaps 40-60'...it's been a really, really long time) with much of the time used by the instructor to dig and eat scallops underwater. They were out of season, but he never brought a live one out, so I suppose it's a loophole of sorts. He found time to make us remove and replace masks, buddy breathe, and doff and don gear, though.

All other in-water training was in the pool. No deep air. No deco. Mixing equipment being "a bit scarce" at the time--I never even saw any!--no He/O2 mixes either, of course. I'm not sure I could even do a fast bounce to 300' and back fast enough not to run out of air in an LP72 in any case, even if I blew off the deco entirely. I have a USN table somewhere but I doubt it could be done without deco even with the 1958 table that was, IIRC, less conservative than today's. I do know I don't want to try it. I did a couple of deco dives post-cert, but it's hard to do that on a single--all I had--so that was about it until much later.

But consider that even modern training standards do not fully exercise the limits of the certs during in-water instruction. I never had to dive to anywhere close to 180' on air for Extended Range, for example, or hit 330' for Advanced Trimix. I never had to demonstrate proficiency dealing with a current or a riptide for any cert. Yet, they were all covered in some degree in training I've had since the YMCA class. I didn't have to mix a trimix for one of my two advanced gas blender certs, either. I did have to do real deco for Deco Procedures, and valve drills for ER, so I suppose that's something.

Nonetheless, the certs cover all these skills and limits for which I have had formal learning only from a book or in a classroom and enable me to buy the gear and gas to exercise the limits of those certs anywhere, just as the original cert did in the 1970's. I expect you any others here know this, but hitting the limits of those certs is a very, VERY different thing from demonstrating your ability to meet standards in the water during a course. (And some of them I don't want to hit, ever, like 180' on air. I'm stupid enough on the boat, thanks very much.) Experience, and approaching certain limits gradually and individually, matters a lot in my opinion.

It's still fun. I'm still learning. I have a ton of gear. (Well, very possibly somewhat more than a ton.) What more could I ask for?

OK, enough topic drift from my end. (Sorry, folks.)

Edit: It belatedly occurs to me that it might seem I was belittling the later training. Nothing could be further from the truth. I had two really good tech instructors and I learned a ton from both of them. AOW was a prereq for later courses, but otherwise a waste of (my) time.
 
Last edited:
It's certainly true that we had more classroom material than in-water exercises, in general.
This is an issue a lot of people miss in comparing old and new courses.

Back then the dominant mode of delivering information to scuba students was via instructor lecture. That is almost never done any more, and for good reason. It is not just the slowest way to transfer information, it is also the least effective. The home study method, where students took books home, read them did exercises, and then went in for a "touchup" with the instructor is far more effective for student learning. The use of a quality eLearning program is even more effective.

When people compare the time spent learning scuba between then and now, they act as if the time the student spends learning at home is not part of the course, and they act as if it is the amount of time spent in the course is all that matters, not whether the student actually learned the material.
 
How can she not see now? That's about as close to drawing somebody a diagram as a situation can get.

On a Rainbow Reef Dive Center boat out of Key Largo back in 2013, we were headed out to do a deep wreck morning dive. 2 Guys, young & fit looking, were on the trip. Somehow, it became known after we were out to sea that they only had OW, not AOW. The Captain offered to look at their log books, but they didn't have those. They had to sit out that dive.

How many people carry their log books on dive boats? A log book with substantial history takes time to fill out. Who wants to pack one around, much less on a boat with salt water spray, etc...?

Richard.

If you have a downloadable dive computer, and upload the data into your computer, you can printout several hundred dives in a matter of minutes. If the dive op wants to check them against the 20 or so latest dives stored in my dive computer, I can just hand them the computer. l stuff a printed copy of downloaded dives accomplished in the last seven years in my save-a-dive bag of goodies. If it gets ruined, no big problem to reprint. I stopped using a paper dive log the first time mine got wet and the pages stuck together.
 

Back
Top Bottom