To stay on topic, can you say if DSS bladders are made in similar size proportions to the outer shell as the DGX pic above?
No. DSS bladders are only very slightly larger than the shells they are used in. Keep in mind that "double bladder" wings, (*not* redundant bladder) meaning those with a sewn outer shell and rf welded inner bladder, the bladder is a "2D" design, like a mylar ballon, and the shell is typically made from multiple pieces, like a tailored suit of clothes.
2D means two flat sheets are rf welded around the perimeter. RF welding dies look like a giant brass cookie cutter. A 2D bladder will never inflate the same as a 3D shell. That requires the Overall outline of the bladder to be a bit larger than the pattern of the shell when deflated.
To avoid stressing the welded seams of the bladder designers have long used bladders larger than the shell. Laminate bladders also don't stretch at all, and this requires even more "extra" bladder to insure the shell is fully filled.
DSS uses custom blown 30 mil urethane. This material does stretch, and is very robust. One could actually use just the bladder with out a shell. We do not recommend doing so, but we have tested it. Years ago when 12 mil urethane was the norm if you inflated a 12 mill bladder outside of a shell it would likely burst before the OPV vented. Not so with 30 mil.
With these properties in mind, i.e. some compliance and very robust welded seams DSS need not oversize our bladders much.
Because we produce our own wings, and weld our own bladders, and produce our own RF welding dies we can control this relationship quite closely.
The advantage is an easier to vent wing.
Welding dies cost money. Producing and stocking multiple sizes of bladders cost money. It's not uncommon for a RF welding "job shop" to have fairly large minimum production run requirements. Those realities lead to one size of bladder being used in multiple wing shells. Most of the time this works ~OK, but the downside can be gas trapping.
Tobin