Thoughts on Bounce Dives

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

OK, if I go from my 90 foot drops to 200 footers....I will just go up to 20 feet where I will grab an O2 bottle and do deco for 10 minutes.... :)

Sperm whales coming up from a long deep dive....surface briefly, then drop down to 30 feet or so and languish about for 15 minutes or so, as a natural deco stop....or so I've heard :)
Dan,

Please read this entire article, and pay attention to Table 1. Also pay attention to the concept of "Equivalent Depth" described on page 7. Here's the article:

An Atypical Case of Taravana Syndrome in a Breath-Hold Underwater Fishing Champion: A Case Report

For some reason unknown to me, the link takes you to page 9. You'll have to use the arrows at the bottom left to get to the beginning of the article.

SeaRat
 
Last edited:
REVAN,

Please read the following abstract from PubMed:


There are other stories and studies of decompression illness happening to U.S. Navy escape tank instructors from breath-hold diving. So don't be so sure that damage hasn't been done by these bounce dives from
free diving. Here are some more links:

A survey of neurological decompression illness in commercial breath-hold divers (Ama) of Japan. - PubMed - NCBI

Decompression sickness following breath-hold diving. - PubMed - NCBI

Decompression induced nitrogen elimination. - PubMed - NCBI

SeaRat

Yes, it is possible for freedivers to get bent. It is more common in the commercial breath hold diving realm because they are not paid to spend time on the surface and this incentivises frequent dives on short intervals. Freedivers have been developing guidelines for diving profiles and diving intervals to help avoid the problem, and divers diving really deep use deco gas just like the tech divers to off-gas after their deep bounce. Divers diving to and beyond the 70m range, upon completion of the dive, will often drop back down to an EAN80 supply at about 15 to 20 ft and allow time to off gas, or sometimes just use surface O2, depending on how deep they went. Unlike the commercial BH divers, this is a much deeper dive, but it will only be done once in a 24 hr or larger interval, not done every few minutes. The really good freedivers are diving beyond 100 meters these days. I think the World Record is around 127 meters, or something like that. At those depths, you better believe that deco is an important part of the dive plan.
 
What is the purpose of doing such a dive? Is it worth dying for. IMO, air is not the ideal gas for such a dive; trimix is.
 
I think the World Record is around 127 meters, or something like that.
One of them is (female variable weight apnea). I guess you're thinking about the record for constant weight apnea (swimming down, then up, using fins); 128m for men and 101m for women.

The deepest freediving record is in no-limits apnea (using a weighted sled to descend and a lift bag to ascend): 214m for men. :shocked2: IMO, that's utter, certifiable insanity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freediving#AIDA_recognized_world_records
 
Dan,

Please read this entire article, and pay attention to Table 1. Also pay attention to the concept of "Equivalent Depth" described on page 7. Here's the article:

An Atypical Case of Taravana Syndrome in a Breath-Hold Underwater Fishing Champion: A Case Report

For some reason unknown to me, the link takes you to page 9. You'll have to use the arrows at the bottom left to get to the beginning of the article.

SeaRat

JOhn,
Thanks for the article....
It actually gives credence to what I had always suspected, that if you are going to deep drops, you need long surface intervals between them....that just because some freedivers are capable of doing a 3 minute or more drop, than a 3 minute surface internal or LESS, and then going back down for another deep drop, is NO reason to actually do it. It makes total sense that you will begin to grow bubbles, or "seeds" with each deep drop.....which gets the whole issue looking more like a scuba diver that is not using long enough surface intervals...or that has some bubbling going on, and then on the SI, decides to do a couple of deep drop freedives between scuba dives.


I think if this ever gets studied in depth, there will be very large differences between "some" individuals and the "average" individuals....suggesting there may one day be some genetic markers for people with some of the mammalian genes which are far more utilized by seals or dolphins. Without going on too far of a tangent, in the late 70's to the early 90's, I did a great deal of diving with the First diver and dive operation owner of Palm Beach---Living dive legend Frank Hammett( was scuba diving Palm beach from around 1955--about a year after when Gagnon invented the Aqua Lung) ....Even into his 60's, Frank could dive the Hole in the Wall on a single al 80 ( depth to 135 feet), shoot fish till he ran OOA....Free ascend to surface, grab another tank, then immediately go back down and shoot till OOA again. I do not believe Frank EVER felt the need to visit a chamber....that he was ever bent enough to know it--or at all. He remains mentally sharp to this day, and in his 60's he was still the fastest swimming diver I had ever met.

Beyond Frank Hammett, George Irvine of the WKPP had/has an ability to off-gas at a level far off the charts when compared to the Us Navy Tables. This led to George and Bill Mee and Dr Bill Hamilton, developing "Special" trimix tables for George to use on 6 hour long bottom time dives at depths averaging 280 feet deep. Deco for this for George would be around 11 or 12 hours--far from the prediction of the Navy tables, and the successful use of these tables by George and JJ and other WKPP members led to Navy Spec Warfare, being onsite for many of the big dives George and JJ did.

George's personal tables were extended for use by others, using VO2 max...a measure that correlated well to overall perfusion and adaptations to intense cardiovascular training, and others would have a multiplier from VO2 max shift their personal tables to the appropriate degree of less aggressive off-gassing, based on the assumptions from their correlated perfusion....
I was, and still am, able to use George's tables today, for 100 foot to 300 foot dives, without any change for Vo2 max--as George and I were close...mine being a bit higher than his in the 90's. He was a competitive Masters Swimmer, I was a racing cyclist ..both require intense peripheral adaptation to training. We assume this is responsible for the faster off-gassing schedules that the WKPP tables utilize.

Point being....for freediving, I see there is powerful evidence now that a form of tables needs to be developed...and that behaviors need to follow this.

I will likely be doing more deep freediving in the near future, due to some of the opportunities in diving I now have, so I plan on looking in to this a great deal more closely...
Having Bill Mee as a dive buddy and close friend, also means I will have him working on some form of table development for my freedivng :)

---------- Post added October 19th, 2015 at 09:43 AM ----------

*** Notes on this
I am not a fan of "tables for everyone"...I was able to see in the WKPP tables, that George could actually make a tech dive safer for him and me, using his schedule, than the dive would have been for us using the Navy Tables...( or the present PADI or GUE tables)...So I do think some factor needs to customize any new table, to the individual.

Tables like what PADI uses are a very bad start of any new science on this, as they include fudge factors such as poor cardio fitness, as well as fudge factors to deal with the 25% of the population that has a PFO--this being a group which obviously needs to be EXCLUDED for the purposes of finding and ideal set of tables for an individual without medical problems.

If ever someone is able to find a genetic Marker for this mammalian gene that makes the person able to off-gas so far from the general distribution as to make no sense whatsoever ( call this the Hammett Gene :) , then this needs to be recognized, and far more doppler and other studies need to be done on each of these people, with hopes of gaining insights as to what types of off-gassing schedules they could actually use.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Dan for the history.I knew there was a lot of variability in susceptibility to DCS and it's good to hear confirmation.I have buddies who get bent diving air deeper than 100' even with conservative computers so they use nitrox and a lot of 02 near the surface.
 
It's generally accepted that at about 217 feet air becomes toxic. Go deeper on air and do so at your terminal peril. A fast descent to about 200 on air with controlled ascent using recreational limits is totally dooable on a normal size tank as a first dive (i.e. no residual Nitrogen). The risk in this dive is the narcosis that you WILL experience. Tunnel vision. Potentially magical thinking. Lack of focus. Now, on their own these things aren't that big of a deal and can be fun, but when you are dropping like a rock and supposed to be paying ABSOLUTE STRICK UNWAVERING attention to your depth gauge, narcosis can be deadly. In sum, don't bounce unless you go with an experienced diver who understands the physiology and has some emergency diving experience.

Without reference to personal beliefs vis a vis whether bounces are dumb... Thoughts or concerns of a technical nature would be great.

Back about eight years ago I lost a friend who thought the way you do on this topic. He did a 200 foot bounce dive with an experienced diver (and now former NAUI instructor) who thought it was totally doable. My friend, Chad, never surfaced. Another diver found his body stuck in the mud at about 205 feet 10 months afterward.

It's not "totally doable" ... it's just another form of Russian roulette. Yeah, you might survive ... this time ... then again, you might not. If you think "an experienced diver who understands the physiology and has some emergency diving experience" would be able to help you under those circumstances, you're kidding yourself ... such a diver would know enough to not contemplate that kind of dive in the first place.

If you want to go to 200 feet, get the training and equipment to do it the right way ...

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
 
For those people bound and determined to see what it looks like at 200 feet or deeper, without the training and skills required.....
There is a solution. You can get to 200 and below, with essentially no skills, and live to tell about it.....
However, the financial costs of such an excursion are considerable...in the order of the cost for training and gear to become a high end rebreather diver, from start, to 300 foot deep tech skills and experience.....

One such solution.....you can reach out to Triton...See this from a shoot I did with them last year.. :)

[video=youtube;sezhdjQRuOs]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sezhdjQRuOs&[/video]

Good for bounces to 3000 feet and more !!! Also for prolonged stays at depth as well.
The 3 passenger model will be ideal for this! Bring your camera !
 
Back in '92 I went for a ride 890 ft down the cayman wall in a research sub converted to deep sea tourism. Back then it was about $300 for a 45 minute dive. It probably costs 3 or 4 times that now. It was incredible and I'm very glad that I did it when I had the chance. I've always wanted to be able to dive at those depths, but the tech doesn't exist to do it in a manner that has acceptable cost and risk for me. I have ideas and maybe I'll build something someday, but it is low on my list of potential projects. I'm kinda hoping someone else will solve the technical problems first so that I won't have to...(nod to Phil Nuytten and his ADS suits). :)
 
hey guys not wanting a fight/argument etc. I THOUGHT 70m/210 feet was the depth where OT started to become was a genuine risk and concern according to the numbers. Not discounting other risks but to me its just another bullet in the gun
 

Back
Top Bottom