I have been perplexed by problems of dramatic overexposure using TTL with my Olympus E-M1 and Sea & Sea YS-01 strobes. (One YS-01 is 3.5 years old; the other was new in summer of 2014). I posted a query about this issue back in August, see http://www.scubaboard.com/forums/ol...rexposure-problem-using-ttl-olympus-e-m1.html
I had only one week of diving with this set-up last summer, so now that Im back home, I have been experimenting with various shutter speeds and aperture settings.
I set the camera on M, used the 60mm lens, and took numerous shots of a small wooden carving from a couple feet away. The room was mostly dark, so the lighting for the shots was supplied almost entirely by the strobes (it was dark enough that for most shots I had to use the Sola focus light to lock focus).
I varied aperture setting from 6.3 up to f22. I varied shutter speed from as low as 1/40th to as fast as 1/320th. The ISO was 200. I did the shot with just the older (left) strobe, then just the new (right) strobe, and then with both strobes.
Do these results suggest that the YS-01 strobes just arent working well with the OM-D cameras, at least for TTL? Should I consider different strobes, or am I doing something wrong? (I know that more experienced diver/photographers will suggest abandoning TTL entirely, but I would like to have the TTL working before I try relying on manual, especially when there are shots that I dont get a second chance with).
Here are two patterns from numerous shots: (when I say overexposed, I mean way way overexposed):
I'm having trouble figuring out how to post photos, but if this works, the following is a pair of examples so you can see the difference between the OK shots and the overexposed ones:
this photo was 125th at F18, with both strobes firing:
This photo was at 125th at F14, with both strobes firing:
I still have an Olympus OM-D E-M5, so I tried the same setup with that camera. Although I didnt do as many variations, it appears that the E-M5 did better.
I really like the EM-1. Do I need different strobes if I want to keep trying with TTL?
I had only one week of diving with this set-up last summer, so now that Im back home, I have been experimenting with various shutter speeds and aperture settings.
I set the camera on M, used the 60mm lens, and took numerous shots of a small wooden carving from a couple feet away. The room was mostly dark, so the lighting for the shots was supplied almost entirely by the strobes (it was dark enough that for most shots I had to use the Sola focus light to lock focus).
I varied aperture setting from 6.3 up to f22. I varied shutter speed from as low as 1/40th to as fast as 1/320th. The ISO was 200. I did the shot with just the older (left) strobe, then just the new (right) strobe, and then with both strobes.
Do these results suggest that the YS-01 strobes just arent working well with the OM-D cameras, at least for TTL? Should I consider different strobes, or am I doing something wrong? (I know that more experienced diver/photographers will suggest abandoning TTL entirely, but I would like to have the TTL working before I try relying on manual, especially when there are shots that I dont get a second chance with).
Here are two patterns from numerous shots: (when I say overexposed, I mean way way overexposed):
- With the EM-1 and a single strobe, regardless of shutter speed, overexposure sets in at apertures of F11, F13, and more narrow.
- almost every shot at F10 was OK
- At F11, the exposure with a single strobe was OK about half the time and way overexposed about half the time.
- At F13, there were four shots that were OK, but 14 that were overexposed.
- At F14 and narrower, the shots were consistently overexposed (though there was one solitary F14 shot that was OK).
- The results with a single strobe differed somewhat depending on whether I used only the 3-year-old strobe or just the brand new strobeI havent tried to analyze that difference.
- When I tried the same settings using both strobes, the results were consistently better than using a single strobe, but overexposure was evident more than half the time at apertures of F16 and narrower.
- At F11 and F13, using both strobes, there were no overexposed shots, even though a single strobe at these settings produced dramatic overexposure at least half the time.
- At F14, with both strobes, one out of four shots were overexposed
- At F16, using both strobes, almost every shot was good
- At F18, using both strobes, almost every shot was overexposed
- At F20, using both strobes, about half the shots were overexposed
I'm having trouble figuring out how to post photos, but if this works, the following is a pair of examples so you can see the difference between the OK shots and the overexposed ones:
this photo was 125th at F18, with both strobes firing:

This photo was at 125th at F14, with both strobes firing:

I still have an Olympus OM-D E-M5, so I tried the same setup with that camera. Although I didnt do as many variations, it appears that the E-M5 did better.
- For example, with a single strobe, the exposures at F11, F13, and F14 were all good, in contrast to the E-M1, which caused overexposure half the time at F11; most of the time at F13, and almost all the time at F14 and smaller.
- At F18 and F20, using both strobes, the shots with the E-M5 appeared to be consistently good, while the E-M1 caused the strobes to overexposure more than half the shots with the same settings
I really like the EM-1. Do I need different strobes if I want to keep trying with TTL?