Oxygen Toxicity Discussion

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

My issue with Nitrox is the narrowing of the safety margins not weather 1.4 is better or worse then 1.6. In my opinion the safety margins are very important to the divers who do not fit into the profile of the people these tables were designed around. Again, I am sure you can show me on paper that by these tables your calculations are correct but that applies only to the people the tables were designed for. Again, I do not see too many in shape divers when I am out on a charter. I know Nitrox sells more training and equipment for the LDS but I think it is at increased risk to the diver and for not much gain.
 
My issue with Nitrox is the narrowing of the safety margins

I don't understand what you mean by this.

Your point about unfit divers is clear, but that applies to all forms of diving, not just EAN.

The reason people mention PPO2 is that breathing air at 30m and breathing EAN28 at 20m (for example) are the same in terms of oxygen loading - so where's the risk?
 

Back
Top Bottom