Unfortunately sometimes diving just isnt for everyone and there is not always a villain. Not taking sides because I wasnt there just adding my 1cent
Thank goodness I clicked on "post quick reply", and somehow my message disappeared. Saved y'all from another wordy soapbox soliloquy. It was about 4 or 5 nice, fat paragraphs of what seemed to me to be very even handed explanation and rebuttal of what you quoted, deeper thoughts. heh.
In short, you're right, diving isn't for everyone, but in light of the new information we've seen from the dive shop in question, and a poster (ScubaPA75) who was on the boat and diving with the OP during the dive in question, what do you call it when someone, (the op), completely misrepresents the fact to the point of what appears to be fabrication?
What do you call it when they use this platform to mis-represent the truth and call the dive operation "sketchy" and "racketeering" and "unethical" and "not well established". It may not be villainous, but whatever it is, it's not good.
Had the poster been honest, and said "gosh, I just don't like them. I don't think others will either", it might have been acceptable, but if you're mis-representing and fabricating, it's something, and I think there's a legal term that escapes me, but again, it's not good.
I wasn't there either, and due to that fact I attempted to be diplomatic about the event. I eagerly await bvana1's counter to the light that's been shed by people actually involved, but at this point, it blows my mind that many people spent time calling out bad instructive practice when the guy wasn't on a cert dive. (according to Deborah Felixson's post). "abandoned his student", "took the student deeper than PADI standards on a cert dive", etc, and so on, and so on. Wow. I'm glad I'm not an instructor that bit into that post.
Btw, IF (that's the large size if) the OP's post had been truthful, in my non-professional opinion, it'd be noteworthy information. I can understand how a dive pro could read that and take issue. But, as I mentioned before, it surprised me greatly, as it bore no resemblance to the practices I've witnessed with that shop and it's employ. Ever. Point by Point, I've not seen what the OP claimed, just the opposite. But I kept an open mined, until now. Again, I do await the OP's counter to the Deborah Felixson post, and the ScubaPA75 posts.
Not trying to pick a fight deeper thoughts. I respect that you admit, as do I, that you weren't there. But in light of the new information, I can't condone the OP's statements.
Ok, 7 paragraphs, but they're skinny....
-Blair