.....Always the first question is, “How did you do?” I did not do well. By the end of the first day, I knew I would not pass. I could not get my floaty feet under control. It drove me, and probably the instructors and classmates, absolutely batty. Although I had plenty of practice in my drysuit, I did NOT have plenty of practice in my drysuit in the single configuration in which I dived.
.....SelkieDVM did an excellent write-up of our activities in her thread, My Fundies Experience: A Class Report The goal of this write-up is to provide my personal observations and opinion of the class. The GUE system is a very structured system with a high bar of performance and uniformity; it gives great confidence and comfort to those that enjoy working within those parameters. I went into this class with a “sir-yes-sir” Basic Training attitude.
Pre-class
.....Once we all signed up for the class, GUE makes available a set of worksheets and reading material for the class. A teammate set up a Facebook page on which we could all discuss our work on the worksheets. GUE also sent an email with some links to an online quiz. Several of us missed that email, because it seemed like a simple “Welcome to GUE” acknowledgement email – bad on us. The class was to read the material, work the worksheets, and take the online quizzes.
.....We did not receive a schedule until about 3 days before class met. Those of us that are planners were not happy. The problem seemed to be this: The schedule flexed to meet the needs of the class, so the instructors did not want to put something out that some OCD person would have a fit over. I wish they had, instead, put out something like, ‘Class will start not later than 8am every morning. You should expect no food / drink / vending machine support, so bring at least lunch. The class may go until 8pm or later if necessary, so be prepared with snacks and drinks to carry over to a late dinner. This schedule will flex and change with little notice.’ That would have given us the opportunity to stock up on Power Bars and the like, to be prepared to flex.
.....The class worksheets did not seem to be in any particular order, nor did they seem to build upon one another. Several discrepancies in the sheets (as well as the online quizzes) were extraordinarily puzzling for an organization that prides itself on organization and attention to detail. I, and a classmate, volunteered to fix the worksheets if GUE would send us an editable document. The documents were presented in a locked .pdf document, so we could not even select the text and copy it to another document. Perhaps now that we are done with the class, that door may open. An issue I had was that I received the worksheets in the metric format, and could not seem to get the English Imperial version thru GUE. However, my teammates helped me out.
.....The worksheets themselves drove some of us engineering-types nuts – please note this is an individual response and YMMV. First, the sheets did not follow mathematical standards for rounding, and seemed to round randomly for “conservatism”. The sheets also introduced a concept (minimum gas) which should always be reserved, and then wasn’t discussed as “minimum gas” for the rest of the sheets. :huh: Also, one should thoroughly study the PowerPoint hand-out pages, because there were a few points mentioned in them (like figuring deepstops as 1/2 max depth, then every 10 feet thereafter) that was not explicitly stated in the worksheets. It made for some interesting “incorrect” answers to drive us nuts. (OCD, anyone?
)
EDIT: - I just heard that a class SOP has been posed to our documents.
.....SelkieDVM did an excellent write-up of our activities in her thread, My Fundies Experience: A Class Report The goal of this write-up is to provide my personal observations and opinion of the class. The GUE system is a very structured system with a high bar of performance and uniformity; it gives great confidence and comfort to those that enjoy working within those parameters. I went into this class with a “sir-yes-sir” Basic Training attitude.
Pre-class
.....Once we all signed up for the class, GUE makes available a set of worksheets and reading material for the class. A teammate set up a Facebook page on which we could all discuss our work on the worksheets. GUE also sent an email with some links to an online quiz. Several of us missed that email, because it seemed like a simple “Welcome to GUE” acknowledgement email – bad on us. The class was to read the material, work the worksheets, and take the online quizzes.
.....We did not receive a schedule until about 3 days before class met. Those of us that are planners were not happy. The problem seemed to be this: The schedule flexed to meet the needs of the class, so the instructors did not want to put something out that some OCD person would have a fit over. I wish they had, instead, put out something like, ‘Class will start not later than 8am every morning. You should expect no food / drink / vending machine support, so bring at least lunch. The class may go until 8pm or later if necessary, so be prepared with snacks and drinks to carry over to a late dinner. This schedule will flex and change with little notice.’ That would have given us the opportunity to stock up on Power Bars and the like, to be prepared to flex.
.....The class worksheets did not seem to be in any particular order, nor did they seem to build upon one another. Several discrepancies in the sheets (as well as the online quizzes) were extraordinarily puzzling for an organization that prides itself on organization and attention to detail. I, and a classmate, volunteered to fix the worksheets if GUE would send us an editable document. The documents were presented in a locked .pdf document, so we could not even select the text and copy it to another document. Perhaps now that we are done with the class, that door may open. An issue I had was that I received the worksheets in the metric format, and could not seem to get the English Imperial version thru GUE. However, my teammates helped me out.
.....The worksheets themselves drove some of us engineering-types nuts – please note this is an individual response and YMMV. First, the sheets did not follow mathematical standards for rounding, and seemed to round randomly for “conservatism”. The sheets also introduced a concept (minimum gas) which should always be reserved, and then wasn’t discussed as “minimum gas” for the rest of the sheets. :huh: Also, one should thoroughly study the PowerPoint hand-out pages, because there were a few points mentioned in them (like figuring deepstops as 1/2 max depth, then every 10 feet thereafter) that was not explicitly stated in the worksheets. It made for some interesting “incorrect” answers to drive us nuts. (OCD, anyone?

EDIT: - I just heard that a class SOP has been posed to our documents.