What a contentious thread. To summarize the facts, fosterboxermom, and please correct or answer where things aren't clear:
1. This diver planned to go to 100' in a group of six divers, including the DM, while two other divers remained above at 60'. That's seven customers and the DM.
2. There was apparently no other person left on the surface.
3. At some point, early in the dive, the victim was separated from the group. Exactly when isn't clear. You say you communicated with the DM once he was lost, did the DM come back up to you from 100' to 60', or was the diver lost already by the time the descent reached 60'?
4. You say the DM was his buddy, but you also say the DM took the five customers as a group to 100'. Where the other four divers in that group paired up in twos as well, or was this a group of six with no sharply defined buddies?
5. Knowing the limits of your friends and your predisposition to remain above 60', were the other four customers experienced divers who wanted to go deep? When the dive was booked, was there any specification of what the dive profile would be?
6. According to the opereator's website, they offer "Guided or Unguided Dives", which was this?
7. Has anyone compared the computers of the rest of the group of six? That should give you detail about when separation occurred and how quickly they were separating. It must have been pretty rapid if he got down past 100m and back to the surface in that short a time.
8. When you said "It was in feet and it was pegged to the max. We went off what was on his computer. And no I don't believe he went that far.", were you suggesting that you believe his computer malfunctioned and he never got down past 300'? Or, rather, are you just expressing a belief that he didn't intend to go that deep?
====
With regard to dive profiles, are these dives booked with any sort of level system? It would seem the schedule of various dives from an operator should specify and group divers accordingly so that you don't end up with a split group like this one.
Also, as a newer member here, I find some of the posting offensive. If you're going to attack a poster's position, the least you could do is actually read what was posted. I can appreciate that this group has a lot of opinionated people with a lot of experience who don't feel like sugar coating things, especially when it comes to safety. That said, there's no reason for anyone to be rude, especially if they don't read the post or position that they are railing about.
I also heartily agree with the sentiment that the certification training should aggressively inform divers that DM's should not be relied upon to ensure your safety.
I'm sure we'll be hearing more about this one.