If a set of doubles contains the same volume of gas as a single tank with the following set-up, what would be the DIR reason to use doubles?

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Redundancy and stability.
I find that my stability is a lot better when I dive a drysuit than my regular wetsuit.Redundancy and stability.
15L or 2x7L would be quite comparable.If each tank were filled identically,a single wouldn't have the same volume of gas as doubles of the same size.
If a set of doubles contains the same volume of gas as a single tank with the following set-up, what would be the DIR reason to use doubles?
SECOND: An H-valve is only redundant from a reg-failure standpoint. It merely provides redundant ACCESS to the relatively small volume of gas contained in a single tank. It does not provide a redundant gas SUPPLY that doubles offer in a situation requiring air-sharing. Particularly important in overhead dives, including deco.
I specifically wanted to exclude the argument "to carry more gas".FIRST: your question contains a faulty premise by specifying "a set of doubles containing the same volume as a single tank" unless you're talking about a set of AL40's doubled up.