I was reading a pretty harrowing article the other day in a magazine (OK, it was FHM's UK edition, so sue me) about a technical dive in a sink hole in South Africa to recover a body at a depth of about 930 feet, and the article contained a throwaway sentence: "Fewer people have dived recreationally below 800 feet than have set foot on the moon."
I had to say that I thought at the time that was extremely unlikely (as only 11 people have walked on the moon, according to Wikipedia), but equally, there must be damn few people who have ever gone below 800 feet for fun (point of fact, the guy writing the article was the only who survived that expedition, and from his report, that was a pretty damn close thing and only because of superhuman efforts by his surface support divers).
FHM is not what I would normally consider a source for factual research, but the guy certainly wrote as if he knew his diving pretty damn well (I'd post his name, except I can't recall it, and I don't have my copy anymore), and he did a decent job of trying to explain it all to a non-diving audience, so I did wonder if that comment might be correct.
Does anyone know?
I had to say that I thought at the time that was extremely unlikely (as only 11 people have walked on the moon, according to Wikipedia), but equally, there must be damn few people who have ever gone below 800 feet for fun (point of fact, the guy writing the article was the only who survived that expedition, and from his report, that was a pretty damn close thing and only because of superhuman efforts by his surface support divers).
FHM is not what I would normally consider a source for factual research, but the guy certainly wrote as if he knew his diving pretty damn well (I'd post his name, except I can't recall it, and I don't have my copy anymore), and he did a decent job of trying to explain it all to a non-diving audience, so I did wonder if that comment might be correct.
Does anyone know?