Anyone care to explain why any mention of ****.info website is blacked out or totally blocked on SB? I'm mystified. Is there some bad blood or history here?
**** : Why the paranoia?
- Thread starter tridacna
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
maj2
Contributor
This has been asked before. More info here:
http://www.divepoll.com/
http://www.divepoll.com/
WOW! Glad im not the only one who thought that site was BS
They are the "National Enquirer" of Scuba, and they don't have the nads to divulge who they are. There are only a few sites we censor, and this is by far the most irresponsible of them all.
And yes, that is a pretty unfair comparison (for the Enquirer).
And yes, that is a pretty unfair comparison (for the Enquirer).
OP
maj2:
Thanks. Very dubious operation.
OP
NetDoc:
NP. Which other ones do you censor?
- Messages
- 26,281
- Reaction score
- 5,879
- # of dives
- I'm a Fish!
******************
############## . n e t is one I know of.
I know Pete, but he asked...:shakehead
############## . n e t is one I know of.
I know Pete, but he asked...:shakehead
- Messages
- 96,686
- Reaction score
- 97,380
- Location
- On the Fun Side of Trump's Wall
- # of dives
- 2500 - 4999
Hmmmm ... why?sjspeck:
Seems innocuous enough ...
... Bob (Grateful Diver)
NWGratefulDiver:
Hey Bob,
Because when that site was started they not only copied word for word SB format, they poached on SB for members in violation of the rules here.
Run a google on idivechick and you'll see what the problem is.
Similar threads
