2airishuman
Contributor
As far as I've been able to determine, the most recent advice from DAN is:
While this appears in an article about failures of double-braided flex hoses, DAN wrote in the same article:
I'd like to broaden and continue the discussion that started in a thread on an unrelated topic.
All the hoses I have purchased in the last few years have been stamped with a date code. LP hoses have a printed quarter and year along the length of the hose, and HP hoses have a date code stamped in the crimp on the SPG end. All bear a CE mark. None of them are marked with their country of origin, supplier name, or any sort of SAE designation.
I believe this is common, but since I have purchased my hoses from a group of closely related direct-to-consumer vendors, I would invite comments on whether this is also common for hoses sold under major brands through dealers (ScubaPro, Mares, Tusa, Atomic, Aqua Lung, etc.)
I offer these questions to frame the discussion:
@iain/hsm @John C. Ratliff @herman @Luis H
All regulator hoses, including braided hoses, have a limited service life regardless of external appearance or reinforcement and protection provided by hose protectors or the braiding itself. The failed hoses we have seen are more than five years old.
While this appears in an article about failures of double-braided flex hoses, DAN wrote in the same article:
[...] a deteriorated internal surface would be completely invisible to a cursory external inspection. It would be premature to speculate that this deterioration is limited to braided hoses.
I'd like to broaden and continue the discussion that started in a thread on an unrelated topic.
All the hoses I have purchased in the last few years have been stamped with a date code. LP hoses have a printed quarter and year along the length of the hose, and HP hoses have a date code stamped in the crimp on the SPG end. All bear a CE mark. None of them are marked with their country of origin, supplier name, or any sort of SAE designation.
I believe this is common, but since I have purchased my hoses from a group of closely related direct-to-consumer vendors, I would invite comments on whether this is also common for hoses sold under major brands through dealers (ScubaPro, Mares, Tusa, Atomic, Aqua Lung, etc.)
I offer these questions to frame the discussion:
- Is the DAN guidance, vague as it is, sound? Is any investigation ongoing that may provide us with more detailed guidance?
- At what number of years since manufacture should a plain rubber SCUBA hose be removed from service, regardless of condition?
- Is there any way to determine, by inspection, whether a plain rubber hose is made using materials similar to those in flexible hoses, justifying more frequent replacement?
- What is a reasonable expectation for freshness of hoses purchased at retail?
- Where is the hose stock coming from for the majority of plain rubber SCUBA hoses?
- Are there any dealers selling hoses made from hose stock that is readily traceable to a higher-quality vendor where a longer useful life could be expected?
@iain/hsm @John C. Ratliff @herman @Luis H