Uncontrolled ascent

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

vjongene

Contributor
Messages
391
Reaction score
48
Location
Rolle, Switzerland
# of dives
1000 - 2499
The incident I want to describe happened 10 days ago at the Castle of Chillon, in the lake of Geneva. I was not there myself, but several of my buddies from the dive club were present and told me about it.

This requires a little introduction: The lake is very cold (6 C at 30 m all year), and deep (over 300 m at its deepest). Most divers here have been trained by CMAS, and therefore learned deco diving on air. This is not considered "tech" diving by local standards. While many dive doubles, the majority of divers here carry single 15l steel tanks. It is not unusual to dive beyond 50 m (170 ft) for relatively short times, and to do a basic deco schedule on the way up. This all means that proper air management is a real issue. Also, because of the cold water, most divers wear dry suits.

The site has claimed a number of lives, mostly because it is one of the few places in the lake where one can dive very deep close to shore. There is a place where fish ("ombles" in French, I don't know the English name) are fraying in November-December, at 40-60 m depth, which is a favorite goal for divers.

Now to the story: A buddy team was diving to 50-60 m to look at the fish. They were wearing dry suits and diving singles. One of the two suddenly realized that he was down to 50 bar and still at depth. He signaled his buddy and started ascending, too fast. The ascent rapidly became uncontrolled. His buddy tried to slow him down by dumping all of his own air and hanging on to him, to no avail. He finally let go. The diver became a surface-bound rocket, completely out of control, and a prime candidate for a serious case of DCS. The buddy, not wanting to become a casualty himself, made a normal ascent and did all of his deco stops.

Very fortunately, there was a small dive boat at the surface (not a common sight on the lake, where most diving is from shore). They spotted the surfacing diver and asked him if he needed assistance. He declined their offer of a tank to return below the surface and do his deco (CMAS procedure here is to extend deco times by 50% after an uncontrolled ascent). They then took him on the boat and provided O2. They also called emergency services on their cell phone. Within 10 min, an ambulance and a police patrol were on the spot. The diver was taken to the nearest hospital and took a ride in the chamber. He was released the next morning, free of any DCS symptoms.

When his buddy surfaced, the diver was already breathing O2 and an ambulance was on the way.

The accident analysis is obvious: poor air management, lack of experience with a dry suit, plus a panic response when he realized he was running out of air. He could have made it to the surface safely by breathing off his buddy's secondary during the deco stops.

To me, there are a few lessons to be learned, though:

- do not dive a dry suit deep until you are completely comfortable with its operation
- always have a small tank of oxygen near your point of exit
- have a cell phone handy as close as possible to your point of exit, or even carry one in a dry container

This guy was lucky to surface near a boat that was properly equipped. I don't know if he had the O2 and phone in his car. Our club does, and this will certainly encourage us to always make sure that someone is carrying the emergency case.
 
A cold water deco dive to 50/60 metres on air with a single cylinder- why oh why? IMHO a case of calling the dive before ever getting in the water.
 
dbulmer:
A cold water deco dive to 50/60 metres on air with a single cylinder- why oh why? IMHO a case of calling the dive before ever getting in the water.

I like that people post incidents here so people can review them. What worries me however is that people may stop if the responses they get are excessively cutting, harsh, or sarcastic. Let's please not let this one degenerate into a contest to see who can do the best job of pegging the jerk-o-meter.

I would personally not place myself in a situation of being 160-195 down on even a large single tank and in fact my preference would be to do it with a deco gas for accellerated deco (and even greater redundancy) as well. Anything below 150 feet is also way too deep on air for my personal tastes.

But the proximate cause of the incident is not local diving and configuration practices but rather the diver's improper handling of the situation. Proper air management would have prevented the situation and unless the diver were a real hoover, 50 bar / 750 psi would have gone a long way toward getting him to the surface and hopefully the buddy would have had adequate air to get them both through the deco stops. While not ideal, the equipment and resources in the water were most likely adequate to get both divers to the surface in the situation.

Redundant doubles and sling bottles would have helped in this situation by reducing the impact of the initial air management mistake that occurred, but if the diver panicked and lost control on ascent, the extra air or deco gas would have made no significant difference in the outcome. Where the diver may have benefitted in having a deco bottle along would have been in possibly understanding that even with 750 psi in his primary tank, he still had adequate gas for a normal ascent and consequently preventing the intial panic.

Lack of experience (with the suit or in general), depth and nitrogen narcosis may have been a factor in the lack of attention to air consumption, the panic that developed and the mis-management of the dry suit during the ascent. Regardless of the equipment used, the diver in question needs to assess his abilities in terms of planning and properly excecuting a deep dive on air.

But the points are well taken that having 02 available at the surface as well as support persons and a means to contact emergency services are very good saftey precautions to take for any deep dive.
 
DAAquamaster,
I disagree with you - I was pointing out the folly of doing this dive in the first place.
My response was not intended to be trite, cutting harsh or sarcastic but factual expressing my disbelief that anyone would attempt that kind of dive. I did not attack the poster only the scenario that was described and stand by my comment.
 
dbulmer:
DAAquamaster,
I disagree with you - I was pointing out the folly of doing this dive in the first place.
My response was not intended to be trite, cutting harsh or sarcastic but factual expressing my disbelief that anyone would attempt that kind of dive. I did not attack the poster only the scenario that was described and stand by my comment.



I totally agree with you!!!! I probably would of replyed the same way you did. I do not dive that deep but just reading the story I definetly have to agree with your comment.
 
My comments ...

To me, there are a few lessons to be learned, though:

- do not dive a dry suit deep until you are completely comfortable with its operation
- always have a small tank of oxygen near your point of exit
- have a cell phone handy as close as possible to your point of exit, or even carry one in a dry container

My first thought in reading your report is that the diver needs more experience in the area of gas management, buddy skills, and buoyancy control before attempting a dive to this depth ... regardless of cylinder configuration and gas mix. This dive failed due not only to lack of proper execution, but primarily because the diver lacked the basic skills to keep from getting into trouble in the first place.

My advice would be to practice these skills at shallower depth before attempting another deep dive. Those skills would be ...

- constant monitoring of depth, time, and air supply
- better communication with buddy, especially with respect to remaining air supply
- better buoyancy control with the drysuit
- OOA ascents ... this one in particular should be practiced until both buddies can maintain stops at depth on a free ascent

In this case, I believe the main lesson this diver should take away from the experience is to avoid deep dives altogether until he gains the requisite experience.

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
 
I think in this particular case, regardless of the amount of things that are pointed out- it all boils down to the fact that the divers in question didn't have the experience to drop to this depth. Although the buddy did stay back and do his deco-so well done there!

We have a similar quarry in ireland - exept for the depth has yet to be established) There have luckily been no incidents, however, everyone that dived there (it's closed now) were drysuit divers, and multiple tank divers.
I did it on a 15L with a 7L pony to 44metres. But it was a bounce dive, no hanging on looking at stuff. Down and back again.

All we can do is hope that people who read this post consider their level of experience before taking on a dive of this level. Thankfully there were no serious casulaties, but as we can see, it had all the right ingredients.

Scubafreak
 
vjongene:
....
Most divers here have been trained by CMAS, and therefore learned deco diving on air. This is not considered "tech" diving by local standards. While many dive doubles, the majority of divers here carry single 15l steel tanks. It is not unusual to dive beyond 50 m (170 ft) for relatively short times, and to do a basic deco schedule on the way up. This all means that proper air management is a real issue.
In my opinion, the root cause of this incident is closely related to the aggressive diving protocols you describe. In addition to the issues mentioned above relating to more training before attempting this dive, the common use of 15l tanks filled with air to conduct this dive is a matter of concern.

1. Diving to 50-60 meters on air uniformly will cause all divers to experience significant narcosis. Claims that divers can overcome the effects of narcosis through repeated exposure have been proven untrue - repeated exposure makes divers believe they are better able to manage narcosis, but testing shows that their reactions remain impaired to the same degree. Moreover, a relatively inexperienced diver is both more likely to panic, and to be less experienced with the effects of narcosis. All divers experiencing narcosis will be impaired in reacting to a real or perceived emergency.

2. At 50-60 meters each breath consumes a significant volume of gas. Diving to that depth with a single 15l tank leaves little if any room for error or reserve for dealing with emergencies. If you calculate the "rock bottom" for a 15l tank, meaning how much gas you need to return both a diver and the diver's gas-sharing buddy to the surface from 60 meters, making all the necessary stops, and allowing for an increased consumption rate due to panic or exertion, you will find that a 15l volume of gas is marginal at best. Your post indicates that you are well aware of the need for watchful management of your gas supply to do this dive, but a more careful analysis of the gas needs for this dive may lead you to conclude that there is an insufficient margin for safety.


vjongene:
To me, there are a few lessons to be learned, though:

- do not dive a dry suit deep until you are completely comfortable with its operation
- always have a small tank of oxygen near your point of exit
- have a cell phone handy as close as possible to your point of exit, or even carry one in a dry container
Consider these additional lessons:

- do not dive beyond 30 meters depth on air
- do not dive beyond the "rock bottom" limit for your gas supply.
 
WJL:
Claims that divers can overcome the effects of narcosis through repeated exposure have been proven untrue - repeated exposure makes divers believe they are better able to manage narcosis, but testing shows that their reactions remain impaired to the same degree.

Dunno how much I agree with this one WJL, at the beginning of each dive year after a couple months off, i find the first time i hit 22-25metres, i can definitly feel the narcosis effects, but by the end of the season i'm at 40-45metres on air with no narcosis symptoms, and I don't feel that I handle the symptoms better, i just dont have the symptoms at all.
But I would be interested in reading any research if you know where to find it?

SF
 
With regard to posts 2, 3, & 6, there is a difference between a one or two line statement about how bad the decision was to make the dive and analysing the dive and providing some insight as to why it was a bad decision and how the safety of future dives could be improved.

I see it all the time at work, quick to criticize, slow to provide alternate solutions.

Cheers,
Bill.
 

Back
Top Bottom