UB-88 found-Dive Report

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Kendall Raine

Contributor
Messages
547
Reaction score
561
Location
Los Angeles
# of dives
2500 - 4999
The only known German U-boat on the West Coast has been found. The dive report follows. More information, including photo's, is available at www.ub88.org

**********************************

UB-88 Dive Report
by Kendall Raine
27 August 2003

I was born July 9, 1959. On July 9, 2003 I received an e-mail from Captain Ray Arntz. It read “Hey Kendall, Give me a call. I think I’ve got a project.”

A project with Captain Ray? That could only mean one thing. A new wreck. Deep too, if he was contacting me. Happy Birthday to me.

When I spoke with Ray the news was better than I could have hoped. Not only did Ray think he and his partner Gary had found a new wreck, but the wreck of the only German U-boat in California waters, the famed UB-88. They even had drop camera and digital sonar images of the wreck. No more rock pile dives.

“The wreck’s deep. We need some video to nail it as the UB-88. Can you do it?” Ray asked.

“No problem. Top secret right?” I responded.

“Top secret. My partner Gary and I have worked too long and hard to have this get out. No screw ups and no show boating. Gary and I have complete control on disclosure. We need this done right the first time and kept quiet. Understood?” Ray answered.

Understood? Gee, let me think about that. “Of course, it’s your show.” I responded.

“Who do you want with you?” Ray asked.

No screw ups and no show time. Hmm. That’s easy. “Johnny and I can do it alone” I said. “Mid-week and not your boat. It’s too well known.” I continued.

“Johnny Walker? Perfect. We’ll probably use my partner Gary Fabian’s boat. He actually found the wreck and the one who’s done most of the work on this thing. If you think I’m good at finding stuff, you should see this guy. He’s better than I am. I’m busy with mid-week charters until mid-August. What works?” Ray said.

“We’re cave diving in Mexico until August 23. How about August 27, Wednesday?”

“Done.” Ray hung up.

Wow. Just like that. Ray and I had been discussing the UB-88 for years. I’d even visited a few deep rock piles in search of it and suddenly this invitation. Despite rumors of it having been found, despite rumors for years of people having the numbers of the UB-88, I’d never seen any proof of either. From what I knew, we’d be the first to dive this wreck.

The UB-88 was a Type UB III German submarine built in Hamburg, Germany and commissioned in January 1918. Despite her late entry to the war, UB-88 managed to sink 13 ships and damage two more during ten months of service. Sent to the United States after the end of the war, UB-88 was paraded around the eastern seaboard as part of the Victory Bond drive before departing for California via the Panama Canal. Based in San Pedro, UB-88 also cruised the West Coast raising money until 1921, when she was stripped and sunk in a live fire exercise by Bill Halsey during his first command aboard USS Wickes (DD-75) (sister ship to the Hogan and Radford). She is the only known U-boat from either war in California waters. She was one of six WWI U-boats given to the US by Great Britain at the end of WWI. One of her sisters was apparently recently found in Lake Michigan.

I left my house at 5 am August 27 bound for John Walker’s house. In the car was loaded my double 104’s with 15/50 and the deco gas necessary for a 25 minute dive at the target depth. There was no traffic and I made John’s house at 6:15. We loaded up and drove to Ray’s and from there down to Long Beach to meet up with Gary and the rest of the team.

Gary’s boat was moored in Long Beach and it was there that we met other members of the project, Mike Lapinski and Harry Davis. Mike would assist Ray in the hooking and gearing up process, while Harry would shoot topside video while Gary handled the boat and shot top side stills. We loaded quickly and headed out to sea. Running at 15 knots, the trip would take us under an hour on our southeasterly heading to the wreck site. Gary recalled his two-year search for the wreck and his search process. Ingenious would barely describe it. It was clear this project had consumed Gary as much if not more than Ray and their pride, enthusiasm and anticipation was infectious. En route, we reviewed drop camera footage taken in July. I could see why Gary and Ray thought they had something. Whatever it was, it wasn’t a rock pile or culvert. Sonar measured the target about 175 feet in length. The UB-88 was 182 feet long and a 19 foot beam. The sonar readings suggested she was largely intact. The drop camera confirmed this was a ship wreck and the few clear frames bore resemblance to deck plans of a Type UB III World War I German submarine.

Gary found the wreck on the first pass and Ray dropped a 50 lbs ingot tied to a float over the side. The plan called for us to establish an up line and then live boat. We reviewed procedures and then dropped over the side up current of the float. Our biggest concern was crew boat traffic as we weren’t far from platform Elly-Ellen. Our dive plan was to tie the up line into the wreck and swim both sides trying to capture signifying marks along the way. If the conning tower was intact-action reports suggested it might have been destroyed during the live fire exercise-we would video that. I would lead, run lines and spot video targets. John, with his new Halcyon lights fresh from the caves of Mexico, would video the dive.

The water at the surface was pea green so John and I stayed close on the descent. The water started to clear below 50 feet though we never got viz better than about 25 feet. Approaching target depth, I searched in the gloom for any sign of the wreck. As the sand came up, I broke out a spool, tied into the up line and headed in the direction of what looked like the shadow of a wreck. Ambient light was very low at this depth. I was really hoping to avoid a protracted search since that would kill our gas and increase our bubble count. After a thirty foot swim the wreck appeared. Curved and covered with corynactus, our initial impression was of a cylindrical hull broken in parts exposing an inner hull. I tied in the spool and turned left leading the dive. Johnny’s twin 24 watt HID’s created an enormous glow behind me and I knew he was busy doing his job. We swam over a large flat plane extending out of the side of the hull. A close look revealed a plane inside another plane with the inner plane connected to the hull at the center. The inner plane was clearly designed to pivot. It was obviously a diving plane with a guard around it. Now I was getting really excited. Not too many surface ships had diving planes. A short swim further on and we came to a wrecked area and the end of the hull. I thought “We’re probably at the bow.” Swimming around the wreckage, I came to the other side of the hull. At this end the beam was probably no more than ten feet. Twenty feet aft of the wreckage another large plane rested on the sand-the other dive plane. Right where it was supposed to be. A large hole in the outer hull was smooth and obviously pre-existing-the anchor housing! Oh this was getting to be fun! Swimming back along the hull, I kept looking up to see if the conning tower was there. In another minute, there it was. Rising 15 feet above the top of the hull, it was covered with a carpet of corynactus and loomed imposing against the green backlight. “Well, that just about nails it!” I said into my regulator in my Donald Duck helium voice. I hope Johnny gets this shot. One more thing to do, though. I ascended the side of the conning tower. A reverse block developed which gave me a brief case of the spins. Holding onto the conning tower to let it subside, I floated up to the top to witness what I’d come for. Two holes about four inches in diameter and three feet apart were at the top. Periscope wells. Bingo! There was absolutely no doubt that this was a sub. Suddenly the gloom was illuminated by car headlights. Heeeeere’s Johnny. I moved out of the shot and pointed with my light at the periscope wells. In front of these appeared what looked like a hatch handwheel. I then swam back down to the hull and headed aft. Behind the conning tower were two hatches, their hand wheels heavily encrusted but still clearly visible. A groove in the pressure hull formed at the junction of the ballast tanks and the pressure hull, and evident in war time photo’s of subs under construction, was clearly obvious. A hole directly into the pressure hull appeared allowing me to shine my light into the interior of the sub. Cool. Swimming further back I came upon a large net suspended off the hull by floats. The net was obviously very old. Dropping behind the net I came to the stern. A steel rail originally attached to the stern lay in the sand. Another obvious clue that this was the UB-88 - the rail appears in the deck plans and is unique to Type UB III boats. Swimming around to the port side of the wreck, I was able to make out propeller shaft struts and the flange into the hull. The shafts and propellers had been removed in San Pedro Navy Yard prior to sinking. Johnny was again right behind me getting everything. “Ray’s going to be a happy man with this video” I thought. I continued forward and examined various places where the outer hull had been breached exposing the pressure hull. Finally, I again came upon the bow plane I had seen at the beginning of the dive. This time I noticed a torpedo tube protruding from the pressure hull. I ran my light back and forth along the length of the torpedo tube-a sign for John to film it. True to form, Johnny was right there and nailed it.

Time was up. I thumbed the dive and pulled my spool. The line caught on my p valve and caused me to wrangle it a bit much to Johnny’s delight. I could hear him laughing into his regulator as I got the line under control and wound up.

After an hour of deco John and I surfaced and Gary & Co. picked us up. We drifted in the current as John put the video on the TV. The video was spectacular. Any doubts were erased. Not only was it undeniably a submarine, multiple identifiers made identification as a Type UB III boat virtually beyond question. Much merriment ensued.

The ride in was spent discussing various aspects of what we’d seen and Gary and Ray’s plans to document their find. Additional dives are being planned to further document the wreck, though Gary and Ray say they have no intention of disclosing the location. Because of the possibility of unexploded satchel charges inside the wreck, there are no plans to open her up, either. Depth and entanglement hazards make this wreck hazardous. Unexploded ordnance on board makes venturing inside very dangerous. Preparations for sinking took four months and it is unlikely that many interesting artifacts remain. Nevertheless, I told Ray I felt honored to be chosen for this project. The wreck itself is a priceless memory. As with the Brother Jonathan expedition, being the first to touch a ship wreck is a very special feeling.

More information about the UB-88, including images from this and subsequent dives, can be found at www.ub88.org.
 
Sweet.

If it's there, I missed it, but what's the depth??

I'm assuming about 250-275ft?

:egrin:

So when are we going?
 
It's really not up to me to disclose. You can contact the head of the project from the website. Your guess is a logical one, however.
 
DeepScuba once bubbled...
If it's there, I missed it, but what's the depth??

I'm assuming about 250-275ft?


TMX 15/50

Ptotal = PO2/FO2 = 1.4/0.15 = 9.33

( 9.33 - 1 ) x 33 = 274 fsw

Very logical.
 
We are smart fellows aren't we :wink:

hehehe

Actually, it's up to my wife...........:yelling:;-0
 
I am not an avid wreck diver. The thought if exploring a REAL wreck, sunk due to accident, is very enticing from a discovery point of view -- not knowing what you might find, the thought of riches beyond my wildest dreams is 'fun'. Unfortunately, SoCal doesn't have many of them (ignoring sailboats, etc...).

Diving on purposely sunken wrecks seems less enticing, except perhaps as good training for diving a REAL wreck, as the chance of real discovery seems remote. To me, ships like the Yukon is an artificial reef which is no better/worse than a real reef. It provides variety and I can understand why some like diving both.

I can also understand when someone discovers a wreck and keeps its location secret in order to (1) salvage it or (2) protect it for historical purposes until the appropriate authorities are made aware and can manage it (like the recent wreck found in Truk; although I understand that someone still stole the ship's bell).

What I don't understand is WHY someone would go to trouble of finding a wreck, tell the world about their accomplishment, but refuse to let anyone else enjoy the wreck -- other than by viewing their photos? On the surface it would seem to be ego or some sort of diving aggrandizement, but there must be more than "see what I found, but you can't have any".

I understand the safety issues in this case, is there a liability issue if someone uses the GPS coordinates, dives the ship and then dies because they become entagled, discharge some live ordinance, or some other issue? I don't by the logic of this argument as if it is lying in 250fsw, its not like Joe RecDiver is going there anytime soon. Besides, we have more than enough Government to help keep us from hurting ourselves..But I am not an attorney, so maybe its degraded to the point where publishing the coordinates of a 'dangerous wreck' is some sort of attractive nuisance.

What am I missing?
 
Otter once bubbled...
What I don't understand is WHY someone would go to trouble of finding a wreck, tell the world about their accomplishment, but refuse to let anyone else enjoy the wreck -- other than by viewing their photos? On the surface it would seem to be ego or some sort of diving aggrandizement, but there must be more than "see what I found, but you can't have any".

What am I missing?

Because Kendall is making all of us on the West Coast eat our hearts out. He has succeeded.

It was a great trip report. The kind of thing we all enjoy reading to get us through our office days.

Kendall Raine Thus Spake...
... we weren’t far from platform Elly-Ellen.

Follow the 270 ft marine contour line around Elly-Ellen, and watch your side scan sonar, and any good pirate can find it.

We are all good pirates, one and all. Yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!
 
Otter once bubbled...
What I don't understand is WHY someone would go to trouble of finding a wreck, tell the world about their accomplishment, but refuse to let anyone else enjoy the wreck -- other than by viewing their photos? On the surface it would seem to be ego or some sort of diving aggrandizement, but there must be more than "see what I found, but you can't have any".

What am I missing?
An unexploded scuttling charge for one.

Joe Rec Diver isn't going to have the ability to dive it, but to put it in perspective, it could be said that this is California's version of the 'Doria. Comparable depths (a little deeper), in open water, right in the middle of the shipping lanes heading into the busiest port on the West Coast.

Sea conditions are WAY better however, and it is very close to shore, which could intice those who are really not qualified to dive her.

There are a lot of stupid divers in the NE who will surface with live ordnance, and we have our fair share out here who would do the same. I can just imagine a 13' Whaler out there dragging it's anchor through the channel while someone tries it solo.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/perdix-ai/

Back
Top Bottom