Scubaroo
Contributor
Hi,
I'm looking at strobes for a Nikonos V (first time UW photographer), concentrating on macro work - I've already decided to go with Ikelite, primarily because of perceived quality and the level of support provided for the Nikonos platform. My initial thoughts were to go for a pair of strobes - a SubStrobe 100A paired with a smaller SubStrobe 50 as a slave. However a recent book purchase ("The Underwater Photography Handbook", Kohler & Kohler, 1999), strongly recommends using equal sized strobes for macrophotography, and includes several photos of example macro systems, all with 2 SubStrobe 50 lights (great book by the way - some spectacular images in it). It also recommends equal sized strobes for wide-angle, which I can understand when you're trying to evenly light a large area.
What do people in this forum find works best for macro? A large and small strobe used in conjunction, or a pair of matched strobes? My reason for going with the large and small was to use the large strobe as the primary lighting for the subject, and the smaller slave would merely "fill in" any harsh shadows cast by the larger light. The larger strobe could also be used later on when I get into wide angle photography.
Ikelite also offer a wireless TTL slave, that dispenses with the need for a dual cord. Anyone used it, and are there any compelling reasons to use that over a dual cord for macrophotography? There is also a cheaper slave version of the SubStrobe 50, called a 50s, which is non-TTL, which avoids having to use either the dual cord or wireless TTL slave. Anyone used it, and any comment on it's performance compared to a TTL strobe when used in a pair/as a slave? It's a cheaper alternative to forking out for both the more expensive standard 50 strobe, and a dual cord or wireless TTL thingamabob, but I'm worried about any negative impact it may have on image quality.
thanks in advance,
Ben
I'm looking at strobes for a Nikonos V (first time UW photographer), concentrating on macro work - I've already decided to go with Ikelite, primarily because of perceived quality and the level of support provided for the Nikonos platform. My initial thoughts were to go for a pair of strobes - a SubStrobe 100A paired with a smaller SubStrobe 50 as a slave. However a recent book purchase ("The Underwater Photography Handbook", Kohler & Kohler, 1999), strongly recommends using equal sized strobes for macrophotography, and includes several photos of example macro systems, all with 2 SubStrobe 50 lights (great book by the way - some spectacular images in it). It also recommends equal sized strobes for wide-angle, which I can understand when you're trying to evenly light a large area.
What do people in this forum find works best for macro? A large and small strobe used in conjunction, or a pair of matched strobes? My reason for going with the large and small was to use the large strobe as the primary lighting for the subject, and the smaller slave would merely "fill in" any harsh shadows cast by the larger light. The larger strobe could also be used later on when I get into wide angle photography.
Ikelite also offer a wireless TTL slave, that dispenses with the need for a dual cord. Anyone used it, and are there any compelling reasons to use that over a dual cord for macrophotography? There is also a cheaper slave version of the SubStrobe 50, called a 50s, which is non-TTL, which avoids having to use either the dual cord or wireless TTL slave. Anyone used it, and any comment on it's performance compared to a TTL strobe when used in a pair/as a slave? It's a cheaper alternative to forking out for both the more expensive standard 50 strobe, and a dual cord or wireless TTL thingamabob, but I'm worried about any negative impact it may have on image quality.
thanks in advance,
Ben