Stoney silence

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

InTheDrink

Contributor
Messages
2,251
Reaction score
437
Location
UK, South Coast
# of dives
1000 - 2499
Removing post as checking shark attack file shows some of the incidents I couldn't find elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
I'm not in any way concerned about diving with these sharks and will go back next year. I'm more curious as to whether there is a deliberate policy of silence so as to prevent damage to the tourist eco-system? Or is it simply that the attacks were not fatal and as such not news-worthy?
Thanks,
John

I cannot speak to your location, but when my nephew was bitten by a Tiger shark in the churning waters of South Padre Island, Texas, the Emergency Room tech told us there were several such attacks lately. The conditions were great for surf fishing; ergo, great for Tiger sharks in the surf. However, none of it was in the news.

I suspect that yes, non-fatalities are not reported as to prevent damage to the tourist eco-system.

Just look at the damage the 'border violence news' had done to the Sonora, Mexico, dive areas.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Back
Top Bottom