Hi All,
I am a magazine journalist and want to get into underwater photography to help sell some of my stories.
I wanted an inexpensive way to shoot reasonable quality stuff underwater without lashing out a fortune. Up top I use a Nikon F100 but want to switch to a D100 later.
Housings for these cameras are crazy expensive.
So I came across the Sony DSC W1 which is about to ber replaced by the Sony W7 - which is 7.2 megapixels and I also came across the Cannon A95. Both have $200 housings by the manafacturer which seem fine.
The advantage of the Sony is that I could replace the W1 with the W7 when it comes out and still use the same housing. The Canon I couldn't but the Canon seems teh better camera.
So would these cameras be OK for 5 megapixel magazine quality work? Would I need more strobes or would they be OK with the built in flash? And would I need a wideangle on these?
Anyway which one shuld I get if at all?
For any help I would be indebted.
Kind regards,
Jonathan
I am a magazine journalist and want to get into underwater photography to help sell some of my stories.
I wanted an inexpensive way to shoot reasonable quality stuff underwater without lashing out a fortune. Up top I use a Nikon F100 but want to switch to a D100 later.
Housings for these cameras are crazy expensive.
So I came across the Sony DSC W1 which is about to ber replaced by the Sony W7 - which is 7.2 megapixels and I also came across the Cannon A95. Both have $200 housings by the manafacturer which seem fine.
The advantage of the Sony is that I could replace the W1 with the W7 when it comes out and still use the same housing. The Canon I couldn't but the Canon seems teh better camera.
So would these cameras be OK for 5 megapixel magazine quality work? Would I need more strobes or would they be OK with the built in flash? And would I need a wideangle on these?
Anyway which one shuld I get if at all?
For any help I would be indebted.
Kind regards,
Jonathan