Ironborn
Contributor
Introduction
I was on Sint Maarten (SXM) for business in early April 2017 and managed to fit a day of three dives into my schedule. The quality of the diving there impressed me more than I had anticipated on the basis of what I had read on this board. I am considering a return trip to SXM for the diving and some topside attractions and would appreciate feedback and suggestions from those with more experience on SXM.
Octopus Diving
I used this board (rather than Trip Advisor) to find a suitable diving operation. I narrowed it down to Octopus Diving and Ocean Explorers and found that Octopus Diving was a better fit for my tight schedule. I booked with Octopus Diving via email and paid a deposit of about half the total cost of a two-tank morning trip and a one-tank afternoon trip (including gear rental) via PayPal. I went on their trips from the Dutch side of SXM because I was staying there and it would have been difficult to reach the French side within my limited schedule. The dive sites on the French side sounded more appealing to me than those on the Dutch side, which seemed to have a higher proportion of wrecks. Octopus Diving indicated that their two-tank morning trips usually include one reef dive and one wreck dive. I am more interested in reefs than wrecks, but I figured that it would be worth trying a wreck dive in order to learn why they appeal so much to so many divers and to see the marine life that wrecks often attract.
Dive Procedures and Conditions
Octopus Diving had a driver pick me up at my hotel and drive me to their shop in the marina on the Dutch side, where I paid my balance via credit card. Tiffany, the French DM, and the Dutch Captain Willem fitted me for my gear, which was in good condition and functioned well during all three dives. They provide weight-integrated BCDs instead of weight belts; I prefer the former, as I have found that weight-integrated BCDs give me better trim. Their gauges used the imperial system, which I prefer because of the smaller, more precise units and my stubborn American resistance to the metric system.
There were five divers on both the two-tank morning trip and the one-tank afternoon trip, plus Tiffany. They set up our gear for us; we did not have to do anything other than dive. Tiffany briefed us on the dive sites and procedures, while Captain Willem briefed us on boat procedures. The water entry was a backwards roll, which is my preference for boat dives. The water exit was via a ladder. Tiffany indicated that the target bottom time was approximately 45 minutes, which seemed rather short to me, especially for the moderate depths of all three sites (never more than 62 feet and usually less) and her tendency to keep us rather close to the boat. Tiffany also had a conservative approach to gas management, indicating that we should prepare to end the dive when we reached 1000 PSI. I suspect that schedule considerations may have been the reason for this rather conservative bottom time and gas management, and it is the only thing that I can criticize in an otherwise excellent diving experience.
Tiffany had a distinctive approach to guiding divers around a site that I appreciated. Rather than going in more or less straight lines or following the topography, she led us around to marine life and other noteworthy sights and attractions that she clearly knew very intimately after diving there for two years. For example, she knew individual reef sharks that she expected us to see at one dive site (and we did see them), and she knew the hiding places of a lobster and an octopus in the remains of a wreck there. The dives were thus unusually rich in sightings of significant marine life, which more than compensated for the short bottom times; I saw more interesting marine life in one 45-minute dive with her than I saw in two longer dives on Curaçao (although the reefs were definitely healthier there).
Diving conditions were excellent that day. It was warm and sunny, with water temperatures into the 80s; I wore a 3mm shorty and experienced no discomfort. Visibility was excellent; we could often see the bottom from the boat. Currents were minimal, but there was some chop at the surface and some surge in a few parts of one reef dive site. The coral coverage was modest in comparison to somewhere like Curaçao, and the reefs were much heavier on gorgonians and soft coral than hard coral. In my opinion, though, the abundant mobile marine life more than compensated for the lesser coral coverage.
Dive Sites
The first site was Cable Reef, which includes a broken wreck. The wreck is in so many pieces that it is not really a wreck dive, but the greater accessibility of those remains made it easier to see the marine life that the remains attracted. In fact, the remains of the wreck were richer in marine life than the actual reef. For example, here are some photos of the many fish near those remains:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:13pm UTC
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:16pm UTC
Tiffany explained that several reef sharks, which she knew individually, lived at this site. She said that she expected to see them, and they arrived shortly after we reached the bottom. We saw them repeatedly throughout the dive, as they seemed curious about us. Here are photos of some of them:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:17pm UTC
There was also a nurse shark at the site:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:21pm UTC
We saw multiple barracudas, including this pair:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:18pm UTC
We saw two lobsters, one of which was too well-hidden inside the remains of the wreck to photograph properly, but Tiffany used her dive light to give me a better shot of this other lobster:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:22pm UTC
I took some close-up photos of flounder:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:19pm UTC
There was also a very curious parrotfish that kept following us around:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:24pm UTC
The second site was Pelican Reef. It was richer in coral and gorgonians but had less mobile marine life. The reef provided good backdrops for these photos of a trumpetfish and a pufferfish:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:37pm UTC
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:28pm UTC
There were reef sharks and barracudas at this site too:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:29pm UTC
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:26pm UTC
The third dive site was the Maze, which was richer in coral and gorgonians and also had more abundant mobile marine life, including the largest French angelfish that I have ever seen and a pair of large triggerfish. The reef provided good backdrops for these fish photos. This coral formation reminded me of a spiked shield. I also saw a pair of flamingo tongue cowries joined together on soft coral; I wonder if they were mating.
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:34pm UTC
I saw the biggest lobster that I have ever seen; Tiffany said there were bigger ones at a nearby wreck:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:33pm UTC
There were reef sharks and barracudas at this site too:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:31pm UTC
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:32pm UTC
Conclusion and Questions
I had an impressive day of diving, with excellent conditions, ample marine life, and a knowledgeable DM. I would have devoted more of my limited free time on my business trip to diving if I had known that the diving would be this good. I did not set aside more time for diving because my prior research on this board suggested that other divers felt that the diving on SXM was worth including in one's schedule in a multifaceted trip to SXM, but not compelling enough to devote a trip to it – compared to more compelling diving destinations in the region, such as Saba or Curaçao. Personally, I found my three dives on SXM more impressive than many of my dives on Curaçao. My question for those of you that find SXM diving less impressive than I did is – why? Did I get lucky or have an unusually knowledgeable DM? Am I easily impressed as a new diver? Does your less favorable assessment weigh the weaker coral coverage and overall reef health more heavily than the presence of mobile marine life?
Do you prefer the diving on the French side or Dutch side of SXM? If so, why?
How are the diving conditions on SXM in early July or late November? (I might return at those times.)
Are the conservative bottom times and gas management that I experienced typical of Octopus Diving and SXM, or are they specific to that particular DM?
Is it feasible to cover SXM and Saba in one week? Is it possible to dive on Saba during the day and return to SXM at night, or would I have to relocate to Saba to dive there? (I would do other things on SXM at night; I imagine that Saba would be less interesting at night, unless you do night dives).
I was on Sint Maarten (SXM) for business in early April 2017 and managed to fit a day of three dives into my schedule. The quality of the diving there impressed me more than I had anticipated on the basis of what I had read on this board. I am considering a return trip to SXM for the diving and some topside attractions and would appreciate feedback and suggestions from those with more experience on SXM.
Octopus Diving
I used this board (rather than Trip Advisor) to find a suitable diving operation. I narrowed it down to Octopus Diving and Ocean Explorers and found that Octopus Diving was a better fit for my tight schedule. I booked with Octopus Diving via email and paid a deposit of about half the total cost of a two-tank morning trip and a one-tank afternoon trip (including gear rental) via PayPal. I went on their trips from the Dutch side of SXM because I was staying there and it would have been difficult to reach the French side within my limited schedule. The dive sites on the French side sounded more appealing to me than those on the Dutch side, which seemed to have a higher proportion of wrecks. Octopus Diving indicated that their two-tank morning trips usually include one reef dive and one wreck dive. I am more interested in reefs than wrecks, but I figured that it would be worth trying a wreck dive in order to learn why they appeal so much to so many divers and to see the marine life that wrecks often attract.
Dive Procedures and Conditions
Octopus Diving had a driver pick me up at my hotel and drive me to their shop in the marina on the Dutch side, where I paid my balance via credit card. Tiffany, the French DM, and the Dutch Captain Willem fitted me for my gear, which was in good condition and functioned well during all three dives. They provide weight-integrated BCDs instead of weight belts; I prefer the former, as I have found that weight-integrated BCDs give me better trim. Their gauges used the imperial system, which I prefer because of the smaller, more precise units and my stubborn American resistance to the metric system.
There were five divers on both the two-tank morning trip and the one-tank afternoon trip, plus Tiffany. They set up our gear for us; we did not have to do anything other than dive. Tiffany briefed us on the dive sites and procedures, while Captain Willem briefed us on boat procedures. The water entry was a backwards roll, which is my preference for boat dives. The water exit was via a ladder. Tiffany indicated that the target bottom time was approximately 45 minutes, which seemed rather short to me, especially for the moderate depths of all three sites (never more than 62 feet and usually less) and her tendency to keep us rather close to the boat. Tiffany also had a conservative approach to gas management, indicating that we should prepare to end the dive when we reached 1000 PSI. I suspect that schedule considerations may have been the reason for this rather conservative bottom time and gas management, and it is the only thing that I can criticize in an otherwise excellent diving experience.
Tiffany had a distinctive approach to guiding divers around a site that I appreciated. Rather than going in more or less straight lines or following the topography, she led us around to marine life and other noteworthy sights and attractions that she clearly knew very intimately after diving there for two years. For example, she knew individual reef sharks that she expected us to see at one dive site (and we did see them), and she knew the hiding places of a lobster and an octopus in the remains of a wreck there. The dives were thus unusually rich in sightings of significant marine life, which more than compensated for the short bottom times; I saw more interesting marine life in one 45-minute dive with her than I saw in two longer dives on Curaçao (although the reefs were definitely healthier there).
Diving conditions were excellent that day. It was warm and sunny, with water temperatures into the 80s; I wore a 3mm shorty and experienced no discomfort. Visibility was excellent; we could often see the bottom from the boat. Currents were minimal, but there was some chop at the surface and some surge in a few parts of one reef dive site. The coral coverage was modest in comparison to somewhere like Curaçao, and the reefs were much heavier on gorgonians and soft coral than hard coral. In my opinion, though, the abundant mobile marine life more than compensated for the lesser coral coverage.
Dive Sites
The first site was Cable Reef, which includes a broken wreck. The wreck is in so many pieces that it is not really a wreck dive, but the greater accessibility of those remains made it easier to see the marine life that the remains attracted. In fact, the remains of the wreck were richer in marine life than the actual reef. For example, here are some photos of the many fish near those remains:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:13pm UTC
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:16pm UTC
Tiffany explained that several reef sharks, which she knew individually, lived at this site. She said that she expected to see them, and they arrived shortly after we reached the bottom. We saw them repeatedly throughout the dive, as they seemed curious about us. Here are photos of some of them:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:17pm UTC
There was also a nurse shark at the site:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:21pm UTC
We saw multiple barracudas, including this pair:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:18pm UTC
We saw two lobsters, one of which was too well-hidden inside the remains of the wreck to photograph properly, but Tiffany used her dive light to give me a better shot of this other lobster:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:22pm UTC
I took some close-up photos of flounder:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:19pm UTC
There was also a very curious parrotfish that kept following us around:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:24pm UTC
The second site was Pelican Reef. It was richer in coral and gorgonians but had less mobile marine life. The reef provided good backdrops for these photos of a trumpetfish and a pufferfish:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:37pm UTC
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:28pm UTC
There were reef sharks and barracudas at this site too:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:29pm UTC
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:26pm UTC
The third dive site was the Maze, which was richer in coral and gorgonians and also had more abundant mobile marine life, including the largest French angelfish that I have ever seen and a pair of large triggerfish. The reef provided good backdrops for these fish photos. This coral formation reminded me of a spiked shield. I also saw a pair of flamingo tongue cowries joined together on soft coral; I wonder if they were mating.
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:34pm UTC
I saw the biggest lobster that I have ever seen; Tiffany said there were bigger ones at a nearby wreck:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:33pm UTC
There were reef sharks and barracudas at this site too:
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:31pm UTC
Instagram post by Paul • Apr 9, 2017 at 4:32pm UTC
Conclusion and Questions
I had an impressive day of diving, with excellent conditions, ample marine life, and a knowledgeable DM. I would have devoted more of my limited free time on my business trip to diving if I had known that the diving would be this good. I did not set aside more time for diving because my prior research on this board suggested that other divers felt that the diving on SXM was worth including in one's schedule in a multifaceted trip to SXM, but not compelling enough to devote a trip to it – compared to more compelling diving destinations in the region, such as Saba or Curaçao. Personally, I found my three dives on SXM more impressive than many of my dives on Curaçao. My question for those of you that find SXM diving less impressive than I did is – why? Did I get lucky or have an unusually knowledgeable DM? Am I easily impressed as a new diver? Does your less favorable assessment weigh the weaker coral coverage and overall reef health more heavily than the presence of mobile marine life?
Do you prefer the diving on the French side or Dutch side of SXM? If so, why?
How are the diving conditions on SXM in early July or late November? (I might return at those times.)
Are the conservative bottom times and gas management that I experienced typical of Octopus Diving and SXM, or are they specific to that particular DM?
Is it feasible to cover SXM and Saba in one week? Is it possible to dive on Saba during the day and return to SXM at night, or would I have to relocate to Saba to dive there? (I would do other things on SXM at night; I imagine that Saba would be less interesting at night, unless you do night dives).