Question Scubapro MK25 EVO o2 cleaning

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Mr_MOS

New
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Location
Germany
# of dives
200 - 499
Dear all,

I want to convert my Scubapro MK25 EVO for 100% oxygen use and keep the DIN 5/8" connection.

Can anyone provide me an explosion drawing for the MK25 EVO NITROX, sothat I can compare, which partsnumbers differ? The explosion chart for the non-nitrox mk25 evo I already have.

Would be helpful as well, if someone knows, if only the parts from the maintenance kit are different or even has an up-to date maintenance manual.

BR
MOS
 
If there is no reason for combustion the internal components will not burn
 
If there is no reason for combustion the internal components will not burn
Well, in my experience this is not true. Almost 40 years ago I was using pure-oxygen CC rebreathers. I mounted the bypass valve on the 1-liter oxygen tank using a gasket different from the original (made of some sort of rubber, not the Teflon which was usually employed) as I did not have one original in good shape.
As soon as I opened the valve on the tank, the bypass valve literally exploded, with a flame half a meter long which perforated the metal body of the valve.
Luckily enough it was far from my face, and I was prompt enough to close the valve, so the flame did extinguish immediately.
After cooling down, I dismounted the valve, and the rubber gasket has simply disappeared.
So I would never again place anything rubber-like in contact with oxygen at 200 bars, if not explicitly oxygen-rated.
 
Dear all,

I want to convert my Scubapro MK25 EVO for 100% oxygen use and keep the DIN 5/8" connection.

Can anyone provide me an explosion drawing for the MK25 EVO NITROX, sothat I can compare, which partsnumbers differ? The explosion chart for the non-nitrox mk25 evo I already have.

Would be helpful as well, if someone knows, if only the parts from the maintenance kit are different or even has an up-to date maintenance manual.

BR
MOS
Hi MOS im keen to know too!
 
At the end I just did a O2 cleansing and ordered the Nitrox Service kit. As I remember only 4-5 parts differ (HP seat and some orings on the high pressure side). The green parts on the picture. And of course make sure to use O2 compatible grease like Christo Lube (was part of the service kit). That‘s all.

BR
MOS
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1545.jpeg
    IMG_1545.jpeg
    126.6 KB · Views: 18
I would be very curious to know specifically what the material is on the seat for the ‘nitrox’ kit. The whole nomenclature is deceptive, because any regulator is fine for nitrox up to 40%, and as far as I know SP specifically says the MK25 is not 100% O2 compatible. In other words, they are selling a rebuild kit that you don’t need for the named usage (nitrox) and aren’t supposed to use for your intended purpose. (100%O2).

If I’m wrong about that, someone can correct me.

I am currently in the process of setting up an O2 reg, and I have two choices; a MK10 and a MK2. I could also convert the MK10 to MK10+ and then use the MK25 ‘nitrox’ seat. I’m happy to share what I’ve learned so far if it’s helpful to anyone.

1. There is little doubt in my mind that the MK2 is theoretically the ‘safest’ of SP 1st stages for O2 use. SP does make an O2 compatible seat for it, and the seat is just a tiny plug. Other than that, there are 2 o-rings that are exposed to HP, the DIN seal and the HP port plug, or SPG o-ring. (Of course there’s also the o-ring that seals to the tank, but all regulators have that) So the MK 2 provides very little fuel for combustion. On the IP side you have 2 piston o-rings and port plugs/LP connections.

2. Since you’re breathing O2 at 20 ft or shallower, you don’t need anything like a high performance regulator. The MK2 is unbalanced but who cares in this situation. In fact, I’m pairing mine with a 108, also unbalanced, that has an orange exhaust tee and mouthpiece. I thought that was a nice touch, and even though it doesn’t matter, there’s very little plastic or rubber in the whole system.

3. I’m not giving up on the idea of using the MK10 for O2 either. The advantage for me is hose routing; it has a turret and that should help with keeping things very neat in storage, important for me as a cave diver, and since it’s a right angle regulator it will sit a little tighter against the smaller (40cft) bottle I’ll be using. There’s more potential fuel in the HP section, in addition to the seat and DIN seal, there’s a separate HP seat seal and the HP piston o-ring, plus an additional HP port. A total of 4 o-rings exposed to HP plus the larger seat. Converting to a MK10+ would presumably allow me to use the special O2 seat SP sells for the MK25, and I honestly have no idea how much of an improvement that seat would be. I don’t particularly trust the MK10+, as it’s known for IP creep and I’ll be leaving this bottle in a cave for a few hours on every dive. Of course the valve will be off, but if it creeps to the point of opening the 2nd stage, water could get in.

4. Here’s a question for anyone who wants to have a whack at it; someone mentioned to me that the knife edge pistons are not considered as safe for O2 use because the sharp edge can more easily heat up. I thought about this and decided it’s got be BS. Air doesn’t flow around the edge at HP, causing friction and heat. It expands around the piston edge, causing cooling. In fact, that spot is theoretically the coldest spot in the 1st stage, which is why piston regs are sometimes packed with grease in the ambient chamber to keep water away from the piston and freezing.

5. The MK10 still has less soft material in the HP section than the MK25 due to the bushings around the HP piston o-ring. And there’s the composite piston, which means a big chunk of plastic in the IP section. I have a pair of MK25s I use for sidemount but I would not choose one for O2 use. Maybe that goes against the common practice, and maybe it doesn’t even matter in the real world. As long as technique is good and the regulators are well cleaned, there’s probably very minimal risk.

6. One last bit to this endless post….I’m using Viton o-rings throughout the 1st stage, 90 duro on the HP side, 75 on the LP side. There is some controversy about this as the toxicity of burning viton is much worse than nitrile, but the combustion temperature is higher. Aviation does use nitrile (or at least used to) in 100% O2 settings. I know this because my old friend Couv (rip) was an aviation mechanic. I’m not crazy about viton as a seal but I figure I’ll be cleaning this reg often enough so that I’m not worried about the o-rings lasting for 5-10 years in use.
 
SP MK25 is good for 40% Nitrox
SP MK25 Nitrox is good for 100%.

Officially stated at SP Homepage: https://scubapro.johnsonoutdoors.co...k25-evo-s270-nitrox-200-bar#learn-more-anchor

BUT, could be, that this Nitrox version is only sold in Germany/EU and not in the US?

Of course the tank attachment spindle differs as well, as it is M26 threaded. And everything needs to be in "green" as to EU laws.

BR
MOS
There's nothing on the SP U.S. site about nitrox regulators or oxygen use.
 
See the Scubapro regulator owners manual.
They are fairly clear in a table that the Mk25EVO, oxygen cleaned and with a Nitrox kit is good to 4350psi (!!) and 100% O2. The jump you have to make is from your Mk25EVO to a Mk25EVO Nitrox.
20240415_190459.jpg
20240415_190429.jpg

20240415_190423.jpg
They're all manufactured the same way. A Mk25EVO Nitrox in the EU is delivered oxygen clean. A Mk25EVO manufactured in the USA is manufactured oxygen clean, but delivered in an open container that makes it EAN40 limited.
All you have to do is oxygen clean the reg and use the kit.
There are only two EU certified second stage combos, but I suspect we will not worry ourselves with that here.

I say this because I emailed René Dupré with exactly the same question, as I couldn't find a service bulletin or remember training from our tech course, that would allow me to service a reg for 100% oxygen. The only thing I could find at the time was a 20‐year-old service bulletin for the Mk20.

He showed me that all I had to do was check the Owner's Manual. And I was blown away by the max pressure allowed. Good luck finding O2 at 4350 psi in this country!

I'm going to guess that the HP seat is PEEK, but that's strictly a guess.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/teric/

Back
Top Bottom