Review; Panasonic GX1, Lumix 8mm Fish Eye, Lumix 14-42mm, Nauticam, S&S YS-D1s

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

mjh

Contributor
Messages
2,213
Reaction score
225
Location
Seattle
With some apprehension I decided to leave my Nikon D7000 and accompanying 20lbs of gear at home. In its stead I wanted to check out one of the “new” 4/3 systems. For this trip the line-up was the Panasonic GX1, Nauticam housing, 2x Sea & Sea YS-D1 strobes, Nauticam Macro Adapter with the Aquatica +10 diopter, Lumix 14-42mm lens and the Lumix 8mm fisheye lens.

MORE INFO AND PHOTOS WILL BE Available at Optical Ocean Sales: Underwater Photo & Video Equipment - 800-359-1295

Size/Weight
Traveling and diving with a 4/3 system was sooooo much easier than a DSLR system.

DSLR WA System w/strobes 17lbs
4/3 WA System w/strobes 8.5lbs

Carry-On with everything I need to shoot and download including chargers, 16 AA batteries, laptop, 2-3 lenses, ports, strobes, arms, clamps, etc.

DSLR System: 35lbs
4/3 System: 21lbs

There are major weight savings due (of course) to the housing, camera, lenses and ports.






Performance Underwater

We were on the edge of two typhoons and conditions were very, very poor. A professional film crew we met left after 1 day saying “shooting conditions were the worst they had ever seen in Sipidan. Photos provided are not for their artistic value but to show potential of camera, strobes and lenses.


Due to the minimal weight and compact overall size I had no qualms about back-rolling in with this system. Not something I typically do with a DSLR system.
The 4/3 system did reduce drag underwater noticeably. So much easier to swim into currents when needed. That is a big acknowledgement for me. I have always found it comical when people worry about a housing being 1.5” wider than another when really the size of their BC, type of fin, way they kick, and waistlines are much bigger factors.

Nauticam GX1 Housing
The Nauticam GX1 housing proved to be very dependable. All the controls worked smoothly, and their layout is logical. One minor issue was having to take my hand off the handle to adjust the top-mounted control wheel for shutter speed, aperture and flash compensation.

The ergonomic design of the housing made it comfortable to hold the housing with my right hand and my left hand on the tray handle. I shot mainly in manual, and as mentioned moving between shutter speed, aperture, and ISO was simple and straightforward. The Nauticam housing makes all the menu items available and is easy to adjust as needed. You can really swim and shoot this rig one-handed. In addition you can, in a reef friendly manner, position this small set up to get shots not possible with a DSLR system. I did have to keep reminding myself to POP THE FLASH UP ON THE CAMERA BEFORE SHOOTING!

Panasonic GX1
This is a very capable camera. Shooting in manual, I found the menus simple and logical. The camera and various lenses focus quickly and accurately even in lowlight situations. If shots were missed, it was typically due to waiting for the camera flash to recycle vs. the lens/camera hunting for focus. Given all the sand in the water I tried to avoid using my focus light as much as possible. The video looks good and I found it fairly easy to White Balance with good results.

On dry land this is a great walking around camera compared to a DSLR. I did find the way the buttons are laid out, I often hit the Function 1 or Display buttons with my thumb. But otherwise, I just put it on a wrist strap and enjoyed not having a couple of pounds bouncing around my neck.

Lenses
The Lumix 3.5-5.6, 14-42mm ASPH lens proved to be more capable than expected. Combined with the Nauticam Macro Lens Adapter and the Aquatica +10 diopter, good macro results are possible. You do have to get fairly close to the subject when using the diopter, but once in range the auto focus is relatively reliable. There’s no problem filling the frame with a medium-sized nudibranch. For new shooters who buy this as their kit lens, you can go out with the flat port and get good results.

NOTE: Photos have some minor correction for color and exposure. NO sharpening or cropping has been applied.

14-42mm + 10 Diopter, 1/125, f14 IS0160, Strobes on 1/2 power



14-42mm + 10 Diopter, 1/125, f14, ISO160, Strobes on 1/2 power

14-42mm + 10 Diopter, 1/160, f22, ISO160, Storbes on 3/4 power


I lean to shooting wide angle, and can’t say enough good things about the 8mm Lumix G Fisheye 3.5 lens. This is a lens that is at it’s best when you are almost touching the subject. Shoot it at f.8 -11 for good to excellent corners. It’s quick to focus, and so tiny behind the 4.33” Nauticam dome. I thought I would really miss the flexibility of my Tokina 10-17mm lens but I didn’t! It reinforced the old saying “your fins are your best way to zoom.”

14-42mm @14mm, 1/125, f5.0, ISO160

14-42mm @18mm, 1/160, f5, ISO 320


For underwater photographers lenses including the Lumix 8mm Fisheye and 45mm Macro or eventually the Olympus 60mm macro will be must-haves. With all the new mid-range zooms, it’s hard to pick a “best of”, but as mentioned, I found the Lumix 14-42mm to be surprisingly good for medium-sized down to macro subjects.

8mm Lumix, 1/160, f8, ISO160

8mm Lumix, 1/100, f7.1, ISO800

8mm Lumix, 1/125, f6.3, ISO320


Strobes
Clearly the YS-D1s are not a 1 to 1 replacement for YS-250 strobes. I can see a few situations where one may miss the power of 250s. I did not miss their weight or bulk. Frankly I don’t miss the Inon Z240s at all.

When shooting big schools of fish, or massive coral heads with the 8mm, I found you need to put on the 120-degree diffusers and put the strobes on ¾ to full power. Otherwise, I typically left the 100-degree diffusers on, popping them off here and there when I wanted more punch.

As mentioned in a previous review, the controls on the YS-D1 are easy to engage. When moving them into different positions I did have to often check I did not shut them off or change/move them from manual to TTL.

I did shoot in A priority and TTL and found the system to work fairly well with a few underexposures, IMHO. I actually found them to work better when shooting manual and TTL. But I like to play with light and never have been one to use TTL in general.

I will probably purchase one or maybe two more YS-D1 for redundancy and for those rare occasions you have gin clear water and huge subjects. Heck four of them are still smaller and lighter than two YS-250s!

In General
I am convinced that the m4/3 class are going to be the cameras for all but the most demanding photographers. The combination of size, weight, travel-ability, excellent picture quality, and growing pool of lenses is more than enough to meet most divers needs. It’s a great way to get into the hobby and it is unlikely you will feel the need to upgrade anytime soon. For those moving up from compacts, you will be smiling from day one and wondering why you did not move up sooner.

As a long time DSLR shooter, there are things I missed about my Nikon D7000. Due to the maximum 1/160 shutter sync speed, I found it hard to shoot good “sunball” shots with the GX1. I missed my VIEWFINDER, maybe that makes me a dinosaur but so be it. I do shoot electrical sync cords with my D7000, so on occasion did find it frustrating to have to wait for the GX1 camera flash to recycle.

That said, the GX1 and its class fellows have me seriously thinking about making the switch from a DSLR. Anyone interested in 50 pounds of Nikon gear???
 
Last edited:
Thanks, as mentioned the GX1 system really is excellent, fantastic mix of quality and price. We can't get the EM5 stuff in fast enough and the lenses are really coming along. The new 12-50mm looks really interesting. IMHO we are just a generation or so away from a 4/3 camera that will be a true rival to the med-high end DSLRs. But again if I am honest and really look at what I am doing with my photos do I really need a full frame sensor and 30megapixels???? For most of us it is like buying a Ferrari to commute to work, lol.
 
Hi

Great review! I have so much to learn! I have a panasonic Lumix GX1. I'm going on a dive trip in January and need to buy gear. I have the 14-24 lens but from reading your article I need the fisheye. It's about $400 cheaper than the wide angle - 7-14. Is this what you recommend? Where did you buy your Nauticam housing? And what lighting equipment should I buy. I'm a novice at underwater photography, love my Nikon D3, but like you, don't want to lug too much weight. So should I get the YS-DI strobe- and what else do I need? Again advice on where to buy?

Your photos are great! Look forward to hearing from you!
 
Mantaraygirl, I guess it is not really obvious but I work at Optical Ocean Sales: Optical Ocean Sales, Seattle's Underwater Camera and Photography Store and we would be happy to help you with your purchase, lol. Of course there are other very reputable dealers out there.

Do you have the 14-42mm? I am not familiar with the 14-24. If you have the 14-42mm the two lenses I would add are the 8mm and the Oly 60mm. The 14-42 and 60mm can be shot behind the same port.

If you don't have the 14-42mm then you have other options. Some love the 7-14mm but reviews show it is not that "much better" than the 9-18mm and the 9-18mm is significantly less expensive. Again the 60mm is a excellent choice. Between the two you would have most situations covered.

IMHO lighting is almost more important than what housing you go with. They YSD1 strobes are excellent and not something you will "out grow". Two are better than one so if it's in the budget go for it.

Don't forget you will probably want a tray, arms, clamps, floats, batteries, etc......for the system. Those can add up so be aware. Hope that helps.
 
mjh,

Is the 14-42mm macro and would be macro at the entire zoom range in contrast to the 12-50 zoom where in macro would only be at a set focal length (I think 43mm)? If one has either one, is there a reason to own the other (14-42 and 1250)?

For the WA, if one owns the 8mm, is there a reason to buy other other WA lens such as the 7-14mm or 9-18mm?
 
The Lumix 14-42 is not a macro lens, it has a minimum focus length 1' or 30cm over the whole range. It is really an "all around" lens. With the Aquatica +10 diopter you could get close enough to get decent macro shots of subjects roughly 1"-2" but they could not be shy subjects. You are correct the 12-50mm has a true Macro feature. The issue with the 12-50mm is if you don't have the Nauticam port with the zoom gear you have to use the Menu for the 12-50mm and it gives you two options, 12 or 43/50 macro and nothing in-between.

So would I own both, no. On the GX1 my lineup would be 14-42, 8mm, and the Oly 60mm. On the Oly EM5 in the Nauticam housing you can make a good case for the 12-50mm, and your wide angle lens of choice. Then if you love Macro add the Oly 60mm, two ports, 3 lenses.

If you own the 8mm and have a budget, like most of us do, shoot the 8mm. As I mentioned with my Nikon D7000 I LOVED the Tokina 10-17mm. I thought I would really miss that zoom but I didn't. Now I am someone who prefers shooting WA so I am a bit biased. Many like the 8mm but feel it is a "specialty" lens.
 
mjh,

It was my understanding that to get the 12-50 work as macro, you had to switch it to macro mode and it would be like 43mm macro with no zoom ability when in this macro mode. For the rest of the range, the 12-50 worked as a zoom lens but not as macro. Isn't this true?

For the WA part of 8mm vs. the other zooms (7-14mm or 9-18mm), I don't follow your answer at all. Does it pay to have either of the 7-14mm or 9-18mm if one has the 8mm lens?
 

Back
Top Bottom