That would be super helpful, thank you! The visualization will really help piece it together.
I understand you will probably be biased in this question but how are the PADI tech courses? I know it's more about the instructor, but I ask because there are a couple TDI shops near me and I'm wondering if curriculum wise, there is a benefit to one over the other.
Actually, I will probably also pursue being a TDI instructor in the near future, so maybe not all that biased.
I will say that the PADI sequence is more structured in terms of progression than TDI with respect to depths, number of deco cylinders, dive structure, and prerequisite courses.
For example, with TDI you are allowed to go directly from AN/DP (usually combined, one deco tank / 150) to Trimix (normoxic trimix, two deco/stage tanks, 200). TDI advanced trimix (hypoxic trimix, at least three deco/stage tanks) requires either extended range or trimix. This means that you could bypass either extended range (2 deco, 180) or helitrox (one deco, 150) to get to trimix.
With PADI you are required to do tec 40 (one 50% deco, 130), tec45 (0ne 100% deco, 145), and tec50 (two deco, 165) before taking tec 65 (normoxic trimix, 210) or trimix (both normoxic and hypoxic trimix, multiple deco and travel gas tanks).
This is good and bad depending on your point of view. The fewer required TDI courses allows competent students to progress faster while the greater number of PADI required courses results in students gaining skills and advance in smaller steps.
I am sure others will disagree with this assessment.