Ron Bigelow has an article on digital manipulation that is an interesting read.
Reality - an article for thought...
- Thread starter alcina
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
Jamdiver
Guest
Thanks for the link Alcina.
This most certainly is an interesting read.
I've often been bemused reading the raging debates going on in photographic forums and what constitutes 'manipulation' in the digital era.
This is often accompanied with the assumption that with film one had to be better at the 'art' of photography to capture great images.
I honestly don't think this is so, the basics of photography apply in whichever medium you use.
The only difference is that with one the darkroom is a physical darkroom and in the other it's confined mainly to a PC.
The very act of capturing an image is 'manipulation' in some sense.
I'm constantly reminded everytime I look through my viewfinder that what the camera captures is nothing like what my eyes see.
I could go on and on from a biological perspective about how exquisitely designed our eyes are and how important certain colours were to our ancestors in the savannahs of Africa but I digress.
For now, i'll refer to an even more interesting read.......
The ultimate round-a-bout no conclusion will ever come discussion........
Digital vs film
This most certainly is an interesting read.
I've often been bemused reading the raging debates going on in photographic forums and what constitutes 'manipulation' in the digital era.
This is often accompanied with the assumption that with film one had to be better at the 'art' of photography to capture great images.
I honestly don't think this is so, the basics of photography apply in whichever medium you use.
The only difference is that with one the darkroom is a physical darkroom and in the other it's confined mainly to a PC.
The very act of capturing an image is 'manipulation' in some sense.
I'm constantly reminded everytime I look through my viewfinder that what the camera captures is nothing like what my eyes see.
I could go on and on from a biological perspective about how exquisitely designed our eyes are and how important certain colours were to our ancestors in the savannahs of Africa but I digress.
For now, i'll refer to an even more interesting read.......
The ultimate round-a-bout no conclusion will ever come discussion........
Digital vs film
Similar threads
- Question
- Locked
