"He was therefore, under PADI Rules, only qualified to dive to 18 metres."
In Kauai last week, on my third dive since certification, one DM took led our group of six. I was loosley assigned with a buddy, but we all stayed with the DM. The other five were very experienced divers and I made it clear that I had only previously dove three days before in the Big Island. On the first dive we went 85 feet (about 25m) for 34 minutes (with 50 minutes SI) and on the second dive went 60 feet for 38 minutes. I found this out after we got back to the shop where a print out was provided.
I got back to my hotel that afternoon to complete my dive book and found that the dives were off of my dive table. Consequently, I never completed the log. (I my naivate' I just assumed I was tired and reading the book wrong - even though I aced the tests in this area.)
It appears that based upon the above quoted statement that I should not have gone so deep. I will be blunt and confess that I was not watching my depth gauge closely since I was following the DM, but even if I had, would not have known what to do about it - assuming I knew that I had to stay above 18m in the first place.
Also, I was the third to ascend, with pre-dive instructions for a safety stop at 20 feet. The DM pointed me in the direction of the line, clearly visible, made certain I began my ascent, and the led the other three back out. I think - think - he stayed relatively close by and within range of my visibility, but the current was strong and I hung on tightly to the safety line while asscending.
Is the depth of an additional 6 meters really a big deal, assuming SI is adequate? The again, how do you know the appropriate SI if it's off the charts??? Could you please share your thoughts? Thank you.
P.S. I spent hours researching reputable dive shops before the trip, which I confirmed with others once I got to Poipu.
In Kauai last week, on my third dive since certification, one DM took led our group of six. I was loosley assigned with a buddy, but we all stayed with the DM. The other five were very experienced divers and I made it clear that I had only previously dove three days before in the Big Island. On the first dive we went 85 feet (about 25m) for 34 minutes (with 50 minutes SI) and on the second dive went 60 feet for 38 minutes. I found this out after we got back to the shop where a print out was provided.
I got back to my hotel that afternoon to complete my dive book and found that the dives were off of my dive table. Consequently, I never completed the log. (I my naivate' I just assumed I was tired and reading the book wrong - even though I aced the tests in this area.)
It appears that based upon the above quoted statement that I should not have gone so deep. I will be blunt and confess that I was not watching my depth gauge closely since I was following the DM, but even if I had, would not have known what to do about it - assuming I knew that I had to stay above 18m in the first place.
Also, I was the third to ascend, with pre-dive instructions for a safety stop at 20 feet. The DM pointed me in the direction of the line, clearly visible, made certain I began my ascent, and the led the other three back out. I think - think - he stayed relatively close by and within range of my visibility, but the current was strong and I hung on tightly to the safety line while asscending.
Is the depth of an additional 6 meters really a big deal, assuming SI is adequate? The again, how do you know the appropriate SI if it's off the charts??? Could you please share your thoughts? Thank you.
P.S. I spent hours researching reputable dive shops before the trip, which I confirmed with others once I got to Poipu.