medic_diver45
Contributor
- Messages
- 304
- Reaction score
- 2
OK, all of you are probably aware, I am the one who threw the flashbang grenade into the hornet's nest that was "The Oxygen Administration" debate. I shot my mouth off before and stepped on some toes in my attempt to balance what I learned in regular clinical settings and what is the "norm" for dive accidents. I have a simple question for the dive medicine docs (I am no longer debating the points were brought up in the previous forum):
If you are far out (say 45 minutes from shore) and you only have a single D tank, is it preferable to give as high concentration of oxygen as possible for a short time (assuming that that is going to burn through the O2 tank faster) or maintain the patient on a lower concentration (say 70%) for a longer period of time?
What are the risks involved with potentially running out of O2 on a DCS patient (that is are they gonna crash or worsen because of a sudden drop in FiO2)?
I can't seem to get anyone to look at this question for me and look beyond the "JUST GIVE AS MUCH O2 AS YOU CAN" response. I'm new to dive medicine (but not to other forms of medicine) and I am trying to learn. Can any of the MD's on here give me honest answers (non-sarcastic) to this?
-Steve
If you are far out (say 45 minutes from shore) and you only have a single D tank, is it preferable to give as high concentration of oxygen as possible for a short time (assuming that that is going to burn through the O2 tank faster) or maintain the patient on a lower concentration (say 70%) for a longer period of time?
What are the risks involved with potentially running out of O2 on a DCS patient (that is are they gonna crash or worsen because of a sudden drop in FiO2)?
I can't seem to get anyone to look at this question for me and look beyond the "JUST GIVE AS MUCH O2 AS YOU CAN" response. I'm new to dive medicine (but not to other forms of medicine) and I am trying to learn. Can any of the MD's on here give me honest answers (non-sarcastic) to this?
-Steve