pressure on body

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

gehadoski

Contributor
Messages
441
Reaction score
4
Location
Cairo, Egypt, Egypt
# of dives
500 - 999
Dear all

I would like to know the max pressure the body can take, regardless of other factors, such as (Nitrogin Narcosis, oxygen toxecity,......etc).
 
gehadoski:
Dear all

I would like to know the max pressure the body can take, regardless of other factors, such as (Nitrogin Narcosis, oxygen toxecity,......etc).

Look for the depth records on scuba. That should give you a reasonable idea.
 
gehadoski:
Dear all

I would like to know the max pressure the body can take, regardless of other factors, such as (Nitrogin Narcosis, oxygen toxecity,......etc).


Two thousand feet is the absolute limit for the unprotected human body.

Not that I would want to test this.


Jason.
 
bosshog:
Two thousand feet is the absolute limit for the unprotected human body.

Not that I would want to test this.


Jason.

Thanks a lot for your reply. I will never try that depth.
 
bosshog:
Two thousand feet is the absolute limit for the unprotected human body.

Not that I would want to test this.


Jason.
How would it be tested? Who came up with that number?
Can chambers go that deep?
 
gehadoski:
Dear all

I would like to know the max pressure the body can take, regardless of other factors, such as (Nitrogin Narcosis, oxygen toxecity,......etc).
Duke took some people to 69.5 ATA. That would be about 2260fsw.

http://hyperbaric.mc.duke.edu/History.html

The biggest problem seems to be how to keep the people breathing at such pressures.
 
I'm not convinced that you can support this figure scientifically. Theoretically, the solid or fluid portions of the human body are incompressible and therefore unaffected by increasing ambient pressure. The problems arise if gaseous spaces (middle ear, sinues, lungs etc) are not equalized to the ambient pressure. Again - theoretically - if equipment can be produced to serve a breathing gas at the appropriate pressure - (and this may be where the figure comes from?) you should cope at any depth.
 
As you increase the pressure, you increase the density of the gas your breathing, to the point where it's so dense you can't breath it. I'd imagine that's what dictates the limit.

I don't think anyone is claiming that assuming your airspace in equalised your going to implode at 2000ft or whatever.
 
Don Burke:
The biggest problem seems to be how to keep the people breathing at such pressures.

I would be interested in knowing what happened to the structure of the bones at that depth/pressure :06:
 
ERP:
. . . I don't think anyone is claiming that assuming your airspace in equalised your going to implode at 2000ft or whatever.

Would make a very cool video, though.

theskull
 

Back
Top Bottom