lunar girl
Guest
Hi everyone.
I have been hanging out on this board for about a year and have picked up so much and feel it that has helped me become a better diver. I only recently signed up on scubaboard because I have some questions that are important to me I would like answered.
I have logged 138 dives so far. I was AOW and Nitrox certified about five years ago (approx 75 dives ago). I definitely understand the dangers of nitrogen levels in your system. I believe I understand and have seen how easy someone can get narced even in depths as little as 30 feet. I also I understand the hows and whys of oxygen toxicity.
But reading some of the posts, such as the ones in the recent Recreational Limits post (OP 2004 but recently re-opened Jan 08), I just feel dumb when reading it...and I don't consider myself dumb. I did my Nitrox certification. Out of 10 people, I was the one showing everyone the "common sense" of the formulas. But I admit, that was a while ago. I have my computer, which I will also admit I rely on too often. But I do know how to use my dive tables for diving with air and Nitrox and just to make sure I remember, use them in addition to my computer just to make sure I dive within my limits. But I was never able to spout off some of the things I read in that thread. Such as
At 130 feet, I guess you're breathing a partial pressure of oxygen equivalent to breathing 100% at the surface.. but even a ppO2 of 1 is way lower than even the most conservative limits of 1.4 and 1.2. Assuming an O2 percentage of 21, 130 feet give you a ppO2 of between 1.0 and 1.1. You'll need to reach 190 feet before you violate the 1.4 ppO2 limit.
The basic premise is based on Dalton's Law. At 132 feet you are close to breathing the equivalent of 100% O2 at the surface. One atmosphere is 14.7psi and at 132 feet you are breathing the equivalent of 1 atmosphere worth of O2...or ppO2 = 1 ata. Since 100% O2 is toxic...especially with increasing pressure...the suggested recreational depth limit was set at 130 feet. However...Oxygen toxicity is based on a dose-time relationship and not just dose. So it is very, very doubtful that one would suffer an ox tox hit at 132 feet within the NDL for a 132 ft dive. Nevertheless...since no one knows his or her tolerance to dosing of 100% O2, and since it is "possible" to get an ox tox hit at 132 feet...it was deemed a play it safe recommendation to keep the recreational dive limit at 130 feet.
OK so assuming they are not looking at their tables, and recognizing the fact that I am a vacation diver, should I be able to spout off numbers like that? What am I missing or do a lot of people recognize that they dont get the numbers the way other people do and just rely on the tables? Am I putting myself at a greater risk because I dont see the depth of the numbers? Is this something that is just inherent in some people? Are these facts things you grasp with more experience?
Although I am a vacation diver, I want to be good at what I do. If I am missing something and need to pay more attention to other aspects of my dive, then let me know. I dont want to get ripped personally by asking the question, but I am asking with an open mind because I want to be a better diver.
Thanks for your help and input!
ME
I have been hanging out on this board for about a year and have picked up so much and feel it that has helped me become a better diver. I only recently signed up on scubaboard because I have some questions that are important to me I would like answered.
I have logged 138 dives so far. I was AOW and Nitrox certified about five years ago (approx 75 dives ago). I definitely understand the dangers of nitrogen levels in your system. I believe I understand and have seen how easy someone can get narced even in depths as little as 30 feet. I also I understand the hows and whys of oxygen toxicity.
But reading some of the posts, such as the ones in the recent Recreational Limits post (OP 2004 but recently re-opened Jan 08), I just feel dumb when reading it...and I don't consider myself dumb. I did my Nitrox certification. Out of 10 people, I was the one showing everyone the "common sense" of the formulas. But I admit, that was a while ago. I have my computer, which I will also admit I rely on too often. But I do know how to use my dive tables for diving with air and Nitrox and just to make sure I remember, use them in addition to my computer just to make sure I dive within my limits. But I was never able to spout off some of the things I read in that thread. Such as
At 130 feet, I guess you're breathing a partial pressure of oxygen equivalent to breathing 100% at the surface.. but even a ppO2 of 1 is way lower than even the most conservative limits of 1.4 and 1.2. Assuming an O2 percentage of 21, 130 feet give you a ppO2 of between 1.0 and 1.1. You'll need to reach 190 feet before you violate the 1.4 ppO2 limit.
The basic premise is based on Dalton's Law. At 132 feet you are close to breathing the equivalent of 100% O2 at the surface. One atmosphere is 14.7psi and at 132 feet you are breathing the equivalent of 1 atmosphere worth of O2...or ppO2 = 1 ata. Since 100% O2 is toxic...especially with increasing pressure...the suggested recreational depth limit was set at 130 feet. However...Oxygen toxicity is based on a dose-time relationship and not just dose. So it is very, very doubtful that one would suffer an ox tox hit at 132 feet within the NDL for a 132 ft dive. Nevertheless...since no one knows his or her tolerance to dosing of 100% O2, and since it is "possible" to get an ox tox hit at 132 feet...it was deemed a play it safe recommendation to keep the recreational dive limit at 130 feet.
OK so assuming they are not looking at their tables, and recognizing the fact that I am a vacation diver, should I be able to spout off numbers like that? What am I missing or do a lot of people recognize that they dont get the numbers the way other people do and just rely on the tables? Am I putting myself at a greater risk because I dont see the depth of the numbers? Is this something that is just inherent in some people? Are these facts things you grasp with more experience?
Although I am a vacation diver, I want to be good at what I do. If I am missing something and need to pay more attention to other aspects of my dive, then let me know. I dont want to get ripped personally by asking the question, but I am asking with an open mind because I want to be a better diver.
Thanks for your help and input!
ME