I've acquired an old Halcyon cannister light to continue my experimentation with a DIR rig. Opened the box last night and discovered that what I thought was going to be a "big" cannister is a FRICKIN' HUGE cannister.
It's an Explorer 50, and the unit itself is roughly the 3/4 the size of a Duraflame fire log!
I'm still diving in a wetsuit here in the Pacific NW (have not yet gotten "cold" enough to feel a drysuit was worth the price, even diving in the winter months), so I'm carrying a lot of weight to offset the thick neoprene (7mm) I'm 6'6", and weigh about 245lbs. Currently, I'm diving with 20lbs in my Zeagle Ranger BC weight pockets, and 20lbs in a belt, and I'm still somewhat underweight when diving with an AL80.
My in-process DIR rig is a SS backplate & wing. I have not yet dived with this configuration and have not yet had time to experiment with weight and trim.
Now to the questions:
1) I've noticed that the OMS system seems to encourage attaching the cannister to the backplate, while the Halcyon system does not. I assume Halcyon's strategy is to permit the diver to ditch the light if necessary to reduce weight or clear an obstruction. My first question is "how does one keep the light from sliding forward along the webbing if the light is not attached to the backplate?" My second question is "Would it be DIR to attach the cannister to the backplate?"
2) This particular light weighs a lot. (good, in my case). However, securely tucked away on my right side, that means I've got a potential balance problem. I considered an unequal weight distribution on the weight belt, but on second thought I believe that will cause the belt itself to shift. My third question is therefore "how do I distribute weight & gear to achieve a balance - what's the DIR configuration that doesn't involve stage tanks?"
Any insights would be greatly appreciated!
Ryan
It's an Explorer 50, and the unit itself is roughly the 3/4 the size of a Duraflame fire log!
I'm still diving in a wetsuit here in the Pacific NW (have not yet gotten "cold" enough to feel a drysuit was worth the price, even diving in the winter months), so I'm carrying a lot of weight to offset the thick neoprene (7mm) I'm 6'6", and weigh about 245lbs. Currently, I'm diving with 20lbs in my Zeagle Ranger BC weight pockets, and 20lbs in a belt, and I'm still somewhat underweight when diving with an AL80.
My in-process DIR rig is a SS backplate & wing. I have not yet dived with this configuration and have not yet had time to experiment with weight and trim.
Now to the questions:
1) I've noticed that the OMS system seems to encourage attaching the cannister to the backplate, while the Halcyon system does not. I assume Halcyon's strategy is to permit the diver to ditch the light if necessary to reduce weight or clear an obstruction. My first question is "how does one keep the light from sliding forward along the webbing if the light is not attached to the backplate?" My second question is "Would it be DIR to attach the cannister to the backplate?"
2) This particular light weighs a lot. (good, in my case). However, securely tucked away on my right side, that means I've got a potential balance problem. I considered an unequal weight distribution on the weight belt, but on second thought I believe that will cause the belt itself to shift. My third question is therefore "how do I distribute weight & gear to achieve a balance - what's the DIR configuration that doesn't involve stage tanks?"
Any insights would be greatly appreciated!
Ryan