Lens choice Raja and Komodo

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Tim Clark Diving

Registered
Messages
49
Reaction score
55
Location
Guam
# of dives
5000 - ∞
I am heading to Raja Ampat and Komodo and need help choosing lenses. Trip is two months total and includes Bali and Borneo land tours so I am trying to minimize my UW kit. I am shooting an OM-1 in an AOI housing. I will be taking my Oly 60 macro and 8 mm fisheye. I am thinking I should take a wide angle zoom as well but don’t have one yet. Any recommendations based on what I will be seeing in Indo? I’ve never been to that area so hoping others have and can tell me what lens they grabbed the most. Thanks!
 
For topside generic wide angle during day time, I think Oly 9-18 f4-5.6 can cover most situation. It's also small, compact when close, and lightweight.
You might also should consider normal range zoom. Personnally I'm using Oly 12-40 f2.8 for this. However, this lens is quite large and heavy.

I'm using EM5III and has following lenses:
  • 7-14 f2.8 - my go to for UW wide angle
  • 12-40 f2.8 - use UW if I'm not sure of the water clarity or what I'd find.
  • 9-18 f4-5.6 - my most EDC for topside. not that good in lowlight. Also good for Vlog style shooting
  • 40-150 f4-5.6
  • 30mm f3.5 Macro - Mostly use for generic UW Macro
  • 60mm f2.8 Macro - Mostly use for UW Supermacro. Also good for portrait
Another recommendation for topside normal range zoom may be the 14-42EZ. However, I heard a lot about this lens that the connection inside was damaged and make the lens unusable.
 
I had been Komodo, Bali included Tulamben and Nysa pennida with e-m1 mkii. 8mm and 60mm were the most useful to taking photos and video from Manta to Nudies.

Also I brought 7-14, 12-40 and 30mm but seldom to use them. If I have to choose only one zoom lens, 12-40 is my answer. When you meet some pelagic those are hard to get close such as Sunfish, 12-40 shall be better than 8mm.

I had no chance to meet Sunfish yet, but many Mantas and turtles in Komodo’s and Nusa pennida were acting like pay models. So 8mm was great and I did regret to bring 7-14 at one Mantas point.
 
I had been Komodo, Bali included Tulamben and Nysa pennida with e-m1 mkii. 8mm and 60mm were the most useful to taking photos and video from Manta to Nudies.

Also I brought 7-14, 12-40 and 30mm but seldom to use them. If I have to choose only one zoom lens, 12-40 is my answer. When you meet some pelagic those are hard to get close such as Sunfish, 12-40 shall be better than 8mm.

I had no chance to meet Sunfish yet, but many Mantas and turtles in Komodo’s and Nusa pennida were acting like pay models. So 8mm was great and I did regret to bring 7-14 at one Mantas point.
We had almost the same set of lenses.

I'd decided not to get the 8mm as for the housing that I use (Ikelite) the 8mm required another dome that would not work with 12-40. Just would like to ask you about the image quality from 8mm vs 7-14mm at the wide end, how much different are they?

I haven't got much success with 12-40, as the zoom adaptor for Ikelite that I use on this lens keep slipping and made me unable to properly adjust. Last December I decided to make change to the zoom adaptor and it work better. However, the dive trip I took at that time wasn't very productive (low viz, strong current) so didn't really get any good pic

60mm Macro work wonderfully in Tulamben, with a +10 dioptor it's even better.

Had a chance with Sunfish in Bali once almost 10yrs ago, but that was with older camera (Canon G16).
 
Aside from housing configuration, the 12-40 is an outstanding u/w lens—I use it more than any other lens. It is sharp enough to crop to faux-macro, and is great for wide scenes. With Nauticam housings it’s a pain, because the body has to go in without the lens and port on, but the results are great if you can figure out an effective port/gear solution.
 
We had almost the same set of lenses.

I'd decided not to get the 8mm as for the housing that I use (Ikelite) the 8mm required another dome that would not work with 12-40. Just would like to ask you about the image quality from 8mm vs 7-14mm at the wide end, how much different are they?

I haven't got much success with 12-40, as the zoom adaptor for Ikelite that I use on this lens keep slipping and made me unable to properly adjust. Last December I decided to make change to the zoom adaptor and it work better. However, the dive trip I took at that time wasn't very productive (low viz, strong current) so didn't really get any good pic

60mm Macro work wonderfully in Tulamben, with a +10 dioptor it's even better.

Had a chance with Sunfish in Bali once almost 10yrs ago, but that was with older camera (Canon G16).
Actually, I didn’t compare two lenses seriously and only have considered angle for objects. So for taking video in underwater, I used 7-14 but, as time goes by, 8mm becomes standard not only photo but video. Especially, the minimum length of focus is very important for me, 8mm fisheye is much better than 7-14.

Here is the video that took at Komodo on 2019. 8mm, 60, 12-40 and 7-14 was also used without crop. I hope it can help you to decide lens.

 

Back
Top Bottom