Kittiwake camera mystery

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Roombaguy

Contributor
Messages
163
Reaction score
11
Location
Grand Cayman
# of dives
50 - 99
In today's Caymanian Compass

===============================

The great Kittiwake camera mystery

Divers are scratching their heads up in Florida after a camera washed up on Crescent Beach, St. John’s County.

Finder of the barnacle-encrusted piece of equipment was Mike Golubovich, who works for St. John’s Country Beach Services in St. Augustine.

“During an inspection on 7 October, 2011, of a Sargassum wrack line that began to form on Crescent Beach, I found the housing,” he told the Caymanian Compass exclusively.

”I took the housing back to our work shop and pried it open with a screwdriver. I was completely astonished when the housing revealed a bone-dry camera. The batteries were not working, but after I changed them, the camera turned on and 153 photos were available for review.

“The camera contains an assortment of images including reef fish, coral, divers, the mermaid statue, and the Kittiwake dive site – a photo of the placard on the wreck,” Mr. Golubovich said.

No date record

As the camera had run out of battery power, the time and date defaulted to zero, therefore there is no date record of when the camera may have been first lost.

“I did notice that there wasn’t a substantial amount of algae growing on the wreck in the photos, possibly suggesting that this dive happened shortly after the sinking of the Kittiwake ... I believe this camera was only used on two dives in the Cayman Islands before it drifted to Florida,” he said.

The ship was sunk on Wednesday, 5 January, to form a special wreck dive as well as serve as an artificial reef for marine life. The project was some eight years in planning and negotiation and drew worldwide interest from media and divers intrigued by the Caribbean’s newest dive attraction.



Calling all divers

As soon as Mr. Golubovich was able to get the photographs off the camera he uploaded them onto the Facebook page of the Kittiwake, where a call was put out by his wife, Angie, to divers who may have lost the camera.

“The housing was covered in barnacles suggesting that it spent some time out at sea,” she wrote. “Did this camera float to Florida from the Caribbean? Do you recognise the diver in the photo?”

Although the distance is more than 1,000 miles, it is not unusual for items to make their way to Florida sands, Mr. Golubovich said.

“We find all kinds of things that wash up on our beaches. We see increases in debris after large storm events and sustained southeasterly to easterly winds,” he said. “We have collections of common household items from many Caribbean Islands.”

The sea, it seems, holds many mysteries – but this is one that people of the Cayman Islands and the wider dive community may well just be able to solve. Sea sleuths, to your computers!

The pictures are viewable on the Kittiwake Cayman Facebook page.

cayCompass.com :: The great Kittiwake camera mystery

One of the pics: Who is this?

story-TOP.jpg
 
In today's Caymanian Compass

===============================

The great Kittiwake camera mystery

...
“The camera contains an assortment of images including reef fish, coral, divers, the mermaid statue, and the Kittiwake dive site – a photo of the placard on the wreck,” Mr. Golubovich said.

No date record

As the camera had run out of battery power, the time and date defaulted to zero, therefore there is no date record of when the camera may have been first lost.

...

IMO, this "no date" statement doesn't make sense, because the images themselves should have EXIF data embedded on them that was saved with the file...it doesn't matter that the camera's batteries were dead.

There's basically only two ways that the EXIF data wouldn't have any useful time/data info embedded:

1. The camera's original owner never set the time/date info when they first got the camera, even though this is a "Do It Once" type operation that most people don't skip when they get a new camera.

2. It was a pretty old camera whose button battery that runs the camera's clock had died, not been replaced and its owner wasn't bothering to reset the date each time he turned the camera on.


Personally, I'd examine copy of one of the full original images, to check out the original & unmodified EXIF data.



-hh
 
The most recent post indicates the date in the metadata was 1/4/00, implying the date in the camera was either set incorrectly, or not set at all.
 
BUMP,,,
inquiring minds need to know.....
 

Back
Top Bottom