diverdowndh
Contributor
Before anyone directs me elsewhere, I intentionally did not post this in the Olympus discussion area, it really is independant of the type of camera. I thought it would be useful to describe what I have though...
I have an Olympus Stylus 600, with the Olympus underwater housing. I used to have a digital camera for my land pics on vacation, and I had a 35mm underwater camera (Sea and Sea MX5). I like the fact that I now have a single camera for both land and underwater, it is somewhat a pain to get ready for diving having to put it all in the underwater housing, etc. but I think it is part of the fun of diving - all the equipment readiness.
So, my point of this thread is, I sometimes get some strange looks from other underwater photographers on boats. It may just be that I haven't spent thousands of dollars for my camera setup but I think a point-and-shoot is a great way to get pretty dang good pics on my dive, while not making my dives taken over by a big bulky camera setup.
Are there others out there that would agree that a simple point-and-shoot solution for underwater pics work for you too? I haven't run into anyone who uses a camera, unless it is a big expensive setup. I love to dive but like the ease of use of the small footprint my camera has. It stays out of the way until I need it, and still have ended up with some really fabulous pictures. I just wondered what others think about it.... I *do* know that when we get back on the boat and I'm reviewing my digital pics (inside the housing, of course) that many non-camera divers ask me to email them some of the great pics I end up with! So, in summary, just curious about what other more serious underwater photographers really think about my setup. Are the "strange" looks just my very introverted imagination <grin>? I absolutely am not trying to stir up any heated discussions, but really would like to have some honest answers from some more professional underwater photographers.... please tell me I"m just paranoid!
Thanks!
I have an Olympus Stylus 600, with the Olympus underwater housing. I used to have a digital camera for my land pics on vacation, and I had a 35mm underwater camera (Sea and Sea MX5). I like the fact that I now have a single camera for both land and underwater, it is somewhat a pain to get ready for diving having to put it all in the underwater housing, etc. but I think it is part of the fun of diving - all the equipment readiness.
So, my point of this thread is, I sometimes get some strange looks from other underwater photographers on boats. It may just be that I haven't spent thousands of dollars for my camera setup but I think a point-and-shoot is a great way to get pretty dang good pics on my dive, while not making my dives taken over by a big bulky camera setup.
Are there others out there that would agree that a simple point-and-shoot solution for underwater pics work for you too? I haven't run into anyone who uses a camera, unless it is a big expensive setup. I love to dive but like the ease of use of the small footprint my camera has. It stays out of the way until I need it, and still have ended up with some really fabulous pictures. I just wondered what others think about it.... I *do* know that when we get back on the boat and I'm reviewing my digital pics (inside the housing, of course) that many non-camera divers ask me to email them some of the great pics I end up with! So, in summary, just curious about what other more serious underwater photographers really think about my setup. Are the "strange" looks just my very introverted imagination <grin>? I absolutely am not trying to stir up any heated discussions, but really would like to have some honest answers from some more professional underwater photographers.... please tell me I"m just paranoid!
Thanks!