It Is Always Good to Know What You’re Looking For, Before You Start Looking -Using REEF Batch Reports

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Pipehorse

ScubaBoard Supporter
ScubaBoard Supporter
Messages
841
Reaction score
3,685
Location
south east florida
# of dives
5000 - ∞
Please excuse the future tense I wrote this late June 2024 and never posted it.


In July, my wife and I are going to Costa Rica, the Pacific side. We are going diving, birding, and horseback riding. I know that REEF has run three trips to the same area where we will be staying. We will be using the same dive shop REEF used on its trips (Rocket Frog Divers). Of course I will be doing fish surveys. However, I have never done surveys in the Tropical Eastern Pacific.
07-13-24 Panamic Fanged Blenny.jpg
It would be ideal to recognize fish species immediately upon observation. So how do I prepare? I use the REEF website and navigate to “Explore Database-Create Reports” and select “Batch Reports”. Found at this link Batch Reports | Reef Environmental Education Foundation. REEF trips to the area of Costa Rica I am interested in took place in July 2018, July/Aug 2021, and June 2023. This means little to no seasonal variability with regards to species that can be seen from when we visit.
(Pacific Fanged Blenny to left)


The Batch Reports reveal what species were recorded, in what numbers, at what dive sites, by how many observers, and novice or expert status of the observers. It also lists the individual REEF members. It only reports the observations as a whole group (Batch), individual efforts are not revealed.
07-14-24 Giant Hawkfish.JPEG


A statistic not reported on the Batch Report is number of species per survey by experts and novices. However, this statistic is reported on Geographic Area Reports. Given that the Tropical Eastern Pacific is surveyed infrequently, running a Geographic Area Report for the dates of the Batch Reports should provide species/survey statistics, without other random surveyors affecting the sampling. There were 2 experts on each trip, and the species/survey average for experts was 49. There were at least 9 novices on each trip, species/survey average for novices 31. This gives me an idea of how many species I should expect to observe on each survey. (Giant Hawkfish above to the right)

The table below has information from Batch Reports and Geographic Area Reports combined.

2018
2021
2023
Observers
13
11
11
Total Surveys
54
79
89
Total Species
123
122
147
Max Species Experts
95
99
108
Max Species Novices
112
113
131
Total Sites Surveyed
7
12
16
Total Hours of Surveys
47.6
76.6
82.7
# Species Reported 75%
9
13
17
# Species Reported 50%
29
26
30
# Species Reported 25%
41
46
48

From the bottom line of the table above at least 41 species and as many as 48 species are observed 25% of the time. As many as 17 species are reported 75% of the time. These include, Barberfish, Balloonfish, King Angelfish, Panamic Sergeant Major, Flag Cabrilla, Guineafowl Puffer, Orangeside Triggerfish, Acapulco Damselfish, Threebanded Butterflyfish, Panama Graysby, Reef Cornetfish, Scissortail Chromis, Cortez Rainbow, Chameleon Wrasse, Mexican Hogfish, Spotted Sharpnose Puffer, and Beaubrummel. Thusly I will concentrate my time studying images of the species occurring at least 25% to 75% of the time.


07-14-24 Yellowtail Surgeonfish.JPEG

Expert sightings vs. Novice sightings. To reach the status of expert by REEF parameters, an individual must complete 35 surveys in each region and pass a level 4/5 test with 90%. A complete breakdown of levels can be found here
https://www.reef.org/experiencelevels.
(Yellowtail Surgeonfish to the left)


Individual efforts of a given member can only be seen by the member, and REEF staff. The above chart reflects inability to see individual effort by experts and novices. For example, on the 2023 trip experts observed 108 species. We can’t see how many species individual experts observed. All novices together observed 131 species. We cannot see how many species each novice observed. It is unlikely that one single expert observed 108 species, and more unlikely that one novice observed 131 species. It should also be noted that on any given trip there were 2 expert surveyors and anywhere from 9-11 novice surveyors.
 
My wife I made the trip down to Costa Rica; we had a great time. Below is a table with my data from the trip in the fifth column (2024).
2018
2021
2023
2024
Observers
13
11
11
1
Total Surveys
54
79
89
16
Total Species
123
122
147
100
Max Species Experts
95
99
108
0
Max Species Novice
112
113
131
101
Total Sites Surveyed
7
12
16
13
Total Hours of Surveys
47.6
76.6
82.7
13.6
# Species Reported 75%
9
13
17
20
# Species Reported 50%
29
26
30
33
# Species Reported 25%
41
46
48
51

07-12-24 Undulated Moray.JPEG
Top ten species I observed were Flag Cabrilla, King Angelfish, Orangeside Triggerfish, Panamic Sergeant Major, Barberfish, Cortez Rainbow, Panamic Fanged Blenny, Reef Cornetfish, Bluechin Parrotfish, and Guineafowl Puffer. Panamic Fanged Blenny and Bluechin Parrotfish do not overlap with the 17 most observed species from the REEF trips to the same area. (Undulated Moray left)

I observed 101 species doing 16 surveys. On the 2023 REEF trip the 2 experts observed 108 species in 16 surveys total. Relatively speaking, 101 species is a good count for the 16 surveys, within expectations. My average species/survey count was 36. Recall from above experts have an average species/survey count of 49, and novices have a species/survey count of 31. Studying before arrival and doing many surveys in other regions would explain my higher count than novices for the region.
07-12-24 Rock Bass.JPEG



The most challenging part of doing surveys in a new area was not finding and recognizing the fish. Instead, finding it on the survey form to check once it had been observed was the challenge. Sometimes it was just easier to write a species on the back than find it to check off on the front later. Species I did not recognize were recorded after the dive when comparing existing images with images I took during the dive. (Rock Bass right)
 
Back
Top Bottom