Is the CNS loading 'half life' concept the result of a misunderstanding?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Dan Sumners

Registered
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Location
London, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
# of dives
25 - 49
My BSAC Sports Diver manual states, with regard to CNS oxygen uptake, "For every two hours on the surface breathing air, the CNS % is reduced by half".

However, the recently published (and highly accessible - I recommend both it and his 'The Six Skills and Other Discussions: Creative Solutions for Technical Divers', even if, like me, you're nowhere near to being a 'technical' diver) 'Staying alive: risk management techniques for advanced scuba diving' by Steve Lewis (Doppler), states "...some divers believe that if a diver surfaces with a CNS loading of X per cent, after 90 minutes on the surface that loading will have dropped to 1/2 X per cent.

"This is not a technique suggested or recommended in any NOAA manual that I know of and was characterised as 'poor science' by Dr Bill Hamilton [who helped prepare the NOAA oxygen exposure limits].

"The only CNS loading tied to a 90 minute half time in NOAA publications are exposures delivering an oxygen partial pressure of 1.6 bar/ata. These are the ONLY [his emphasis] exposures given a half time of any sort.

"If we check out the single dive limit for 1.6 bar (45 minutes) and compare it to the daily limit (150 minutes), it becomes apparent something different goes on compared to what happens with lesser ppO2s [eg single exposure for 1.5 bar is 120 mins and 24 hour is 180 mins]."

I think - but am not sure - BSAC isn't the only agency that teaches the half life, and a quick search online shows many believe it to be the case, as one would expect if it's being taught. However, BSAC does seem to be the only agency that says the half life is 2 hours, rather than 90 minutes.

Can anyone shed any further light? Does anyone have any counterevidence to Steve Lewis's claim? Do you know on what evidence BSAC or any other agency bases its claim, if any? Or are the agencies passing on potentially dangerous misinformation?
 
hey Dan, thank you for the question... I believe MANY, MANY technical instructors teach and are encouraged to teach the half-life concept with regards CNS... as you've noticed, my contention is that by using the 24-hour CNS tables, we are safer, following the recommendations of Bill Hamilton, and making things simpler for ourselves.


Anyhow, sitting in a Cafe in Hythe, Kent right now... figuring out if it's just raining or if this is the FLOOD. Looking forward to the discussion. Take care, mate. Dive safe and again, thanks for your support.
 
Thanks for the reply Steve. Yes it's very clear to me, and I will be doing that rather than following BSAC's advice. I like to be as safe as possible. In fact, the emphasis on safety in my initial traning was one of the main things that attracted me to diving!

Replies to my post elsewhere though (and I'm surprised it hasn't been of interest to others on here) have generally been that loads of divers have used the concept for years without (apparent) adverse effect, which constitutes at least some evidence of its validity. Thoughts?

And things have settled down a ittle here in SE London, but I'm keeping my gear in reach!
 

Back
Top Bottom