No.
The early Mk 25's had the non-finned swivel cap. The finned cap came along around June-July 2003.
The Mk 20 became the Mk 25 the day SP added the new seat carrier with the IP adjustment. Otherwise the two were exactly the same the day that occured on the Mk 20 production line.
The late production Mk 20 already had the larger ambient pressure holes in the swivel cap, the comopsite piston and the new "Mk 25" yoke/DIN retainer. Since it became the Mk 25, there have been some slight changes in the TIS system (minor change to the composite piston, change in the piston bushing, changes to the rubber piston stem boot), the change to the finned swivel cap, a restyled LP port turret and a new yoke screw.
So in effect, the progression from early production Mk 20 to current production Mk 25 is a slow gradual evolutionary process with no clear definition of a Mk 20 versus a MK 25 other than the adjustable IP seat retainer - and that can be retrofitted as can all the other later Mk 25 parts, so that difference is basically meaningless.
SP should have just stayed with the Mk 20 numeration as the regs are effectively the same, but I suspect the marketing folks wanted a "new" first stage to market. I think it is also significant that the styling changes such as the new finned turret occurred within about a year of the Mk 25's introduction and suspect this may have had more to do with the difficulty in convincing Mk 20 owners to buy a "new" Mk 25 that looked exactly the same as their old Mk 20 than with improving heat transfer.