How Bad Are Our Oceans

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

cdiver2

Contributor
Messages
3,783
Reaction score
8
Location
Safety Harbor (West central) GB xpat
# of dives
500 - 999
By Helen Briggs
Science reporter, BBC News, Boston





'Fly-over' of impacted oceans



Only about 4% of the world's oceans remain undamaged by human activity, according to the first detailed global map of human impacts on the seas.

A study in Science journal says climate change, fishing, pollution and other human factors have exacted a heavy toll on almost half of the marine waters.

Only remote icy areas near the poles are relatively pristine, but they face threats as ice sheets melt, they warn.

The authors say the data is a "wake-up call" to policymakers.

I think the big surprise from all of this was seeing what the complete coverage of human impacts was

Dr Mark Spalding, The Nature Conservancy
Lead scientist, Dr Benjamin Halpern, of the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis in Santa Barbara, US, said humans were having a major impact on the oceans and the marine ecosystems within them.

"In the past, many studies have shown the impact of individual activities," he said. "But here for the first time we have produced a global map of all of these different activities layered on top of each other so that we can get this big picture of the overall impact that humans are having rather than just single impacts."

Co-author Dr Mark Spalding told BBC News that the map was the first attempt to describe and quantify the combined threats facing the world's oceans from human factors, ranging from commercial shipping to over-fishing.

"There's an element of wake-up call when you get maps like this," he said. "Human threats are all pervasive across the world's oceans.

"The map is an impetus for action, I think that it is a real signal to roll up our sleeves and start managing our coast and oceans."

Complex model

The international team of 20 scientists in the US, Canada and UK built a complex model to handle large amounts of information on 17 different human threats.

They divided the world's oceans into 1km-square sections and examined all real data available on how humankind is influencing the marine environment.

They then calculated "human impact scores" for each location, presenting this as a global map of the toll people have exacted on the seas.


The researchers say they were shocked by the findings.


"I think the big surprise from all of this was seeing what the complete coverage of human impacts was," said Dr Spalding, senior marine scientist at the conservation group, The Nature Conservancy, in Newmarket, UK. "There's nowhere really that escaped. It's quite a shocking map to see."



He said the two biggest drivers in destroying marine habitats were climate change and over-fishing.



"Out on the high seas, climate change and fishing were far and away the strongest influences," he explained. "The least impacted areas are the polar regions but they are not untouched."



Clear message


The scientists hope the map will be used to prioritise marine conservation efforts.



Andrew Rosenberg, a professor of natural resources at the University of New Hampshire, US, who was not part of the study, said policymakers could no longer focus on fishing or pollution as if they were separate effects.



"These human impacts overlap in space and time, and in far too many cases the magnitude is frighteningly high," he said.

"The message for policymakers seems clear to me: conservation action that cuts across the whole set of human impacts is needed now in many places around the globe."


The findings of the study were presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Boston, US.
 

Attachments

  • OCEAN WORLD MAP.jpg
    OCEAN WORLD MAP.jpg
    26.6 KB · Views: 47
Call to halt deep sea 'plunder'
By Jonathan Fildes
Science and technology reporter, BBC News, San Francisco



Slow-growing coral species are at risk from trawling
Fuel subsidies that allow fishing fleets to "plunder" the deep seas should be scrapped, claim a group of leading international scientists.

They said more than $150m (£80m) was paid to trawler fleets, promoting overfishing of unviable resources.

In particular danger were slow-growing deep-sea fish and coral species caught by bottom trawling, they argued.

2006 UN talks failed to implement a ban on the method, which uses heavy nets and crushing rollers on the sea floor.

"Eliminating global subsidies would render these fleets economically unviable and would relieve tremendous pressure on overfishing and vulnerable deep-sea ecosystems," said Dr Rashid Sumaila, of the University of British Columbia.

Travel money

Eleven nations have bottom-trawling fleets, with Spain's being the biggest.

Researchers at the University of British Columbia estimate that without subsidies, these fleets would operate at a loss of $50m (£27m) annually.


Coral clearance: Bottom-trawling and its bycatch


In pictures

Most of the subsidies were for fuel, the marine researchers said, which allows the trawlers to travel far out to sea and drag the heavy nets needed for bottom-trawling.

"There is surely a better way for governments to spend money than by paying subsidies to a fleet that burns 1.1 billion litres of fuel annually to maintain paltry catches of old-growth fish," said Dr Daniel Pauly, one of the researchers who has looked at the issue.

Japan, South Korea, Russia, Australia and France are amongst the other countries that subside their trawlers.

Continuing payments to these fleets would inevitably lead to depleted fisheries, said Dr Pauly.

"You get a signal from the stock - I am old, I am rare and I am depleted," he said.

"Subsidies allow you to overlook that signal and keep fishing to the end."

Slow reproduction

Deep-sea species that are currently caught by deep-sea trawling methods include orange roughy, previously known as slimeheads, and Patagonian toothfish, better known as Chilean sea bass.

The fish were renamed to be more palatable to consumers.

Cold-water species like the orange roughy are particularly at risk because they lead such long lives.

"This is a species that grows so slowly that it might not reach sexual maturity until it is 34 years old and they live to be 150 years old," said Dr Selina Heppell, from Oregon State University.

"There is a strong correlation between living a long time and not reproducing very quickly so they are very easy to over exploit."

The fish also tend to cluster around seamounts and cold-water coral reefs.

Because deep-sea fishing methods are so indiscriminate these ecosystems can easily be destroyed.

Ancient species

"The corals like the fishes are extremely slow growing; they're also extremely long lived," said Dr Murray Roberts of the Scottish Association for Marine Science.

Species can live for up to 2,000 years, making them the longest-lived organisms in the sea.

"These animals can live for hundreds of years but they can be removed in one sweep," he said.

They are also important he said because the corals were an archive of past climates, locking in the chemical signatures of past sea water.

"We not only run the risk of losing a structure that supports fish but also a climate archive that we have only just begun to unravel," said Dr Roberts.

Slow movement

Last year, conservation groups and governments from countries such as the Netherlands and Norway argued for a ban on bottom-trawling at the United Nations.

But the talks ended with only an agreement for some precautionary measures to ensure that trawlers do not cause significant damage to marine ecosystems.

The compromise declared areas where deep-sea corals and other vulnerable species occur closed to bottom-trawling, unless fishing nations can prove their activities will do no harm.

And on 2 February this year, Japan, Korea, Russia and the US agreed to phase in a management plan for deep-sea fisheries around seamounts in the Northwest Pacific.

But even with these agreements, the scientists, assembled in San Francisco for the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) annual meeting, believe subsides need to be scrapped.

"From an ecological perspective, we cannot afford to destroy the deep sea," said Dr Sumaila.

"From an economic perspective, deep-sea fisheries cannot occur without government subsidies.

"The bottom line is that current deep fisheries are not sustainable."

IN PICTURES BBC News | In pictures: Bottom-trawled, bottom-cleared, Before ...

BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Ban on 'brutal' fishing blocked
 

Back
Top Bottom