I'm in the market for a new housing. I'm at the point where I'm not really satisfied with the port selection on the Salted Line housing, given that SeaFrogs doesn't offer extensions for their ports (especially the domes). I'm either going to replace the Salted Line housing I have for my a6400, or get an entirely new housing for my A7IV. My biggest decision there comes down to whether I want to keep the setup smaller, or go bigger and benefit from the A7IV's much better autofocus and responsiveness.
I recall reading recently a discussion (here or on wetpixel or waterpixels, which of course I cannot find now) comparing different brands of housings. Many of the respondents mentioned that (paraphrasing here) Nauticam was the gold standard, with wonderful build quality and excellent ergonomics. They also said that Ikelite had (again paraphrasing) "bad to terrible" ergonomics, though no bad comments on quality.
So what am I'm here for? I'd like to hear from people who have actually used both an Ikelite or either a Nauticam, Marelux, or other similarly priced housing.
I recall reading recently a discussion (here or on wetpixel or waterpixels, which of course I cannot find now) comparing different brands of housings. Many of the respondents mentioned that (paraphrasing here) Nauticam was the gold standard, with wonderful build quality and excellent ergonomics. They also said that Ikelite had (again paraphrasing) "bad to terrible" ergonomics, though no bad comments on quality.
So what am I'm here for? I'd like to hear from people who have actually used both an Ikelite or either a Nauticam, Marelux, or other similarly priced housing.
- What are your thoughts on the ergonomics between the two?
- Do the Ikelites really have "terrible ergonomics"?
- Did you find that the improved ergonomics of the more expensive housing was "worth the difference"? Yes I realize this is very subjective
- Setting the ergonomics aside, what did you prefer about the Ikelite, and what did you prefer about the more expensive system?