High altitude fresh water diving

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

jap

Guest
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Whether it is necessary at diving in high-altitude fresh-water lake to make the amendment to the indication of the depth gauge on density of fresh water for definition of theoretical depth?
 
oh my, you really worded that as complicated as possible, didn't you?

After reading it four times, I still am not sure what the question is. I'll make a guess.

You wanna calibrate your depth gauge to account for the reduced density of water at higher altitudes? You're thinking is that the "less dense water" will screw up your gauge accuracy? Hmmm... I don't believe I've ever heard this question before. I have no idea what reduced atmospheric pressure will do to the density of water.

I only work with "high density water", at the bottom of the sea. Water's densest at its coldest liquid phase.
 
Excuse me for my bad English. If the depth gauge is calibrated for sea water, in fresh water it will give inexact indications. For definition of theoretical depth it is possible to use these indications, or updating is necessary?
 
The important thing is to have a depth gauge that can be adjusted to accomodate the reduced atmospheric pressure at the surface at altitude so that the needle really reads zero at the surface.

Assuming you can zero the needle on the depth gauge, the inaccuracy in the the depth gauge reading under the surface will be due to the differing densities of fresh water versus sea water. This is only about a 3% difference so if you are diving in fresh water at an indicated depth of 99 FSW you would actually be at about 102 ft. But the important thing is that the absolute pressure would still be 4 ATA and it's the pressure that is important, not the depth gauge reading.


Personally, I have never seen the need to reference anything to feet or meters fresh water, as pressure is pressure and pressure is what counts. As long as the tables are calibrated in feet or meters sea water, everything works better if the depth gauge reads in feet or meters sea water.

The Cross corrections for theoretical ocean depth on the US Navy tables assume the depth gauge is reading in feet sea water, so no correction is required nor should the gauge reading be corrected to the fresh water value.
 
jap:
Excuse me for my bad English. If the depth gauge is calibrated for sea water, in fresh water it will give inexact indications. For definition of theoretical depth it is possible to use these indications, or updating is necessary?
You do not need to account for the difference in water density or depth. Your depth gauge is really reading pressure and then converting it to a depth. So the water pressure is the same whether you are at 100' in the ocean or 103' in the ocean. Since the tables are baased on water pressure (just reading depth), no compensation is needed for thefresh water.
 

Back
Top Bottom