robint
Contributor
Yep, that's actually the camera that spurred me to start looking into this more seriously
After reading about the Sea&Sea, my thought was $600 is the price point for any number of new Sony/Canon/Fuji/Casio/Panasonic P&S cameras that capture 720p, including housings. That throws the market wide open, and I'd love to find a resource that tests the quality of the movie modes on these cameras (especially low light, WB, etc). $600 is fine if it's going to be a good step up from what I have now...it's collecting the data to determine how big of a step up that's got me flummoxed right now.
well here is my 2 cents about using a still camera for video.....
~still cameras take great still photos and mediocre video, a cheap still camera doesn't even do great stills
~there is no red filter for color balance so videos are very blue with no depth of field
~there is no way to attach video lights so holding a flashlight with a hotspot is the extent of that, which isn't good
~resolution is grainy due the low quality so videos are only good at small size, you can't really enjoy them on your tv set at home
~many of these still cameras taking videos make it seem like you can edit the same as with a standard camcorder, but you can't as the files are saved in a format not compatable with the good quality editing programs
just a few thoughts....
Gombessa, I think you have talent, I would like to see you buy a dedicated video camcorder and housing. You can spend $1500 and still be able to avoid all the things I listed above. I think you would be happier by far with your results.
robin
