Hamilton and Scourge survey

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

underH2Oman

Contributor
Messages
628
Reaction score
195
Location
Kitchener, Ontario
# of dives
I'm a Fish!
The article seems to tell you who is doing them. I remember Jim Kennard and Dan Scoville wanted to be part of one of the expeditions to the wrecks because they are banned for one reason or another. Unfourtantly, I dont think a magnetometer isn't going to tell them much. They did not capsize or drift much from when they went under, otherwise those heavy cannons would bust loose and they would not be there. The intactness of the wrecks show that they took on water slow enough that the cabins did not blow off during the sinking and that heavy objects did not roll much. Divers who dove them in the 80's before the ban could tell you more than they can today about what is actually down there. We found the E.B. Hale in 2010 and that is a great example of what happens when a heavy cargo and objects bust through the hull and actually leave a trail 1/2 mile long right to the wreck. Sonar surveys I've seen before on these two vessels do not indicate a large debris field.
 
The article seems to tell you who is doing them. I remember Jim Kennard and Dan Scoville wanted to be part of one of the expeditions to the wrecks because they are banned for one reason or another. Unfourtantly, I dont think a magnetometer isn't going to tell them much. They did not capsize or drift much from when they went under, otherwise those heavy cannons would bust loose and they would not be there. The intactness of the wrecks show that they took on water slow enough that the cabins did not blow off during the sinking and that heavy objects did not roll much. Divers who dove them in the 80's before the ban could tell you more than they can today about what is actually down there. We found the E.B. Hale in 2010 and that is a great example of what happens when a heavy cargo and objects bust through the hull and actually leave a trail 1/2 mile long right to the wreck. Sonar surveys I've seen before on these two vessels do not indicate a large debris field.



The survey witch one was done many years ago that never seemed to accomplish anything.
 
Numbers have always been available.
 

Back
Top Bottom