NudeDiver
Contributor
From another thread...

My question is more about knowing the dive site and what to do about it (if anything).
We have two sites I go to - pretty much the only two sites I go to (one of them much more than the other). I have some idea of what's down there - and what it's like. For the primary site, a very crude map is available. When I go to these places (shore dives) with my buddy, we really do not plan much of anything. Yeah, we talk about whatever, yeah, we'll do buddy checks, yeah, we might go over a few signals and agree at what point we should turn back (generally at a half tank) and what the signal is - and we MIGHT say, "let's not go below X depth." But that's it. Navigation isn't a big deal either. Down slope is deeper, up slope is shallower. If you're going deeper, you know that shore is the other way - even if you can't see the bottom. Nothing too complicated about that.
We never sit down and go, "OK, we'll go to to X depth for Y time, and then go to A depth for B time" or whatever. Frankly, we just go down there and look around until it's time to turn back. Our dives are not so complicated that it seems like SAC rate would be an issue, in terms of using them to plan the dive in some way - since we don't really know how deep we're going to end up going anyway. 25m would be a deep dive for us, 18 or 20m would be more typical. We're conservative enough that even if we were at 25m and burning air faster than normal, it would not be a big deal to just go to the surface and swim back to shore if we really had to. Unpleasant, sure, but not a big deal. FWIW, as far as I can remember, we only had to do that once and it seems like it had something to do with something other than air consumption.
As an added twist - and PLEASE don't let this bring out the "anti-air-integrated crowd" and related comments - please - please - please (I know the arguments already, thanks) - if we are both using AI computers and using the "estimated time based on actual consumption" as a GUIDE (again, I know the issues, thanks), in addition to the NDL and in addition to the actual tank reading - doesn't SAC and depth planning take on MUCH less significance in the scenario that I've provided? Not any other scenario (I'm looking at YOU J.R.)...this one.
Anyway - I know I have asked the "how much planning do you need?" question before, but it wasn't in these terms (concerning SAC and gm issues), so here it is again.
Now, what I am about to ask is NOT about SAC rates or being able to calculate them. Please don't answer that question here. There are other threads for such thingsTeamcasa:One way or the other, I do need to be able to calculate my SAC and at a minimum, know how long I can last on a specific amount of gas at a specific depth.

My question is more about knowing the dive site and what to do about it (if anything).
We have two sites I go to - pretty much the only two sites I go to (one of them much more than the other). I have some idea of what's down there - and what it's like. For the primary site, a very crude map is available. When I go to these places (shore dives) with my buddy, we really do not plan much of anything. Yeah, we talk about whatever, yeah, we'll do buddy checks, yeah, we might go over a few signals and agree at what point we should turn back (generally at a half tank) and what the signal is - and we MIGHT say, "let's not go below X depth." But that's it. Navigation isn't a big deal either. Down slope is deeper, up slope is shallower. If you're going deeper, you know that shore is the other way - even if you can't see the bottom. Nothing too complicated about that.
We never sit down and go, "OK, we'll go to to X depth for Y time, and then go to A depth for B time" or whatever. Frankly, we just go down there and look around until it's time to turn back. Our dives are not so complicated that it seems like SAC rate would be an issue, in terms of using them to plan the dive in some way - since we don't really know how deep we're going to end up going anyway. 25m would be a deep dive for us, 18 or 20m would be more typical. We're conservative enough that even if we were at 25m and burning air faster than normal, it would not be a big deal to just go to the surface and swim back to shore if we really had to. Unpleasant, sure, but not a big deal. FWIW, as far as I can remember, we only had to do that once and it seems like it had something to do with something other than air consumption.
As an added twist - and PLEASE don't let this bring out the "anti-air-integrated crowd" and related comments - please - please - please (I know the arguments already, thanks) - if we are both using AI computers and using the "estimated time based on actual consumption" as a GUIDE (again, I know the issues, thanks), in addition to the NDL and in addition to the actual tank reading - doesn't SAC and depth planning take on MUCH less significance in the scenario that I've provided? Not any other scenario (I'm looking at YOU J.R.)...this one.
Anyway - I know I have asked the "how much planning do you need?" question before, but it wasn't in these terms (concerning SAC and gm issues), so here it is again.