Galapagos or cocos?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Spoon

Contributor
Messages
6,554
Reaction score
2
Location
Philippines
# of dives
200 - 499
im planning a trip in the distant future budget permitting, im the type of guy who researches well ahead of time. these are two of my dream destinations. which would you guys choose and why? pro's and con's of each? thanks in advance.
 
My wife and I returned from the Galapagos in late Sept. Had a fabulous time on a 10-day trip on Sky Dancer. Originally, chose Sept. because it is supposed to be prime whale shark season. The downside is the water is colder at this time of year, and the seas are rougher. We saw all the usual suspects: eels, rays, mantas, red-lipped batfish, dolphins, penguins, sea lions, and melonhead whales. Biggest highlights were two whale sharks and tons of schooling hammerheads. Absolutely best diving we've ever seen.

I've never been to Cocos, but have done similar research to you and also spoke to divers who had been to both. So with that caveat, here are my pros and cons for the Galapagos:

PROS: Fabulous diving with the opportunity to see whale sharks and hammerheads. Relatively easy to get to (you fly directly to the islands in order to catch your liveaboard). Shore excursions are fascinating and a great way to spend your surface intervals.

CONS: One of the most expensive dive trips around, though perhaps not much more expensive than Cocos. Water is fairly cold (usually 60s during the prime months of July to November). Don't recall what the water temp is in the Cocos.

From what I've heard, the general consensus is that Cocos has more shark activity. However, one diver on this trip told us that he thought the activity on the Galapagos was better. Luck of the draw, I guess. The only other comment I've heard is that the 36 hr. trip to Cocos can be brutal if the seas are rough. That in itself is enough to sway many people (me included). Have fun wherever you end up!
 
goldcountrydiver:
Don't recall what the water temp is in the Cocos.

I've never been to either (serious newbie here), but from what I've heard, water temp at Cocos is high 70's and low 80's. There's a recompression chamber on the Galapagos, but since Cocos Island is uninhabited, the nearest medical facilities are a pretty long way away. I don't know if you consider this a concern or not. Again, I've never been to either, so all I know about either destination is from either the internet, dive magazines, or from the Discovery Channel. Cocos Island is supposed to be more picturesque above water than the Galapagos. I've sure both have some nice diving.
 
Cocos looks more like the usual concept of a "tropical island." The Galapagos are very stark because of their more recent volcanic activity. However, given the wildlife and history of the Galapagos, I thought the shore excursions on the Galapagos were outstanding, more than making up for their stark appearance.
 

Back
Top Bottom